HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous


Membership:
Latest: RichardZ
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 13126

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 552
BOT: 1
Total: 553
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Your Account
02: Home
03: Forums
04: Home
05: Forums
06: Photo Albums
07: Forums
08: Photo Albums
09: Forums
10: Forums
11: Home
12: Forums
13: Forums
14: Your Account
15: Forums
16: Forums
17: Photo Albums
18: Photo Albums
19: Forums
20: Forums
21: Home
22: Home
23: Photo Albums
24: Forums
25: Forums
26: Forums
27: Photo Albums
28: Forums
29: Forums
30: Forums
31: Forums
32: Forums
33: Forums
34: Forums
35: Your Account
36: Your Account
37: Photo Albums
38: Home
39: Your Account
40: Forums
41: Forums
42: Forums
43: Forums
44: Your Account
45: Forums
46: Forums
47: Forums
48: Forums
49: Forums
50: Forums
51: Forums
52: Forums
53: Forums
54: Forums
55: Forums
56: Forums
57: Forums
58: Forums
59: Forums
60: Forums
61: Forums
62: Forums
63: Forums
64: Forums
65: Home
66: Forums
67: Forums
68: Photo Albums
69: Forums
70: Forums
71: Home
72: Your Account
73: Your Account
74: Forums
75: Your Account
76: Forums
77: Forums
78: Forums
79: Forums
80: Forums
81: Forums
82: Forums
83: Forums
84: Forums
85: Forums
86: Your Account
87: Forums
88: Forums
89: Forums
90: Forums
91: Home
92: Forums
93: Forums
94: Your Account
95: Forums
96: Forums
97: Your Account
98: Forums
99: Forums
100: Forums
101: Forums
102: Forums
103: Forums
104: Photo Albums
105: Forums
106: Forums
107: Forums
108: Forums
109: Photo Albums
110: Forums
111: Forums
112: Forums
113: Forums
114: Photo Albums
115: Photo Albums
116: Forums
117: Photo Albums
118: Forums
119: Forums
120: Forums
121: Forums
122: Forums
123: Forums
124: Forums
125: Forums
126: Photo Albums
127: Forums
128: Forums
129: Your Account
130: Forums
131: Forums
132: Forums
133: Forums
134: Forums
135: Forums
136: Your Account
137: Your Account
138: Home
139: Forums
140: Forums
141: Forums
142: Forums
143: Forums
144: Your Account
145: Forums
146: Forums
147: Forums
148: Your Account
149: Your Account
150: Forums
151: Forums
152: Forums
153: Photo Albums
154: Your Account
155: Forums
156: Forums
157: Forums
158: Forums
159: Forums
160: Forums
161: Home
162: Forums
163: Forums
164: Forums
165: Forums
166: Forums
167: Forums
168: Your Account
169: Photo Albums
170: Forums
171: Photo Albums
172: Forums
173: Forums
174: Forums
175: Forums
176: Photo Albums
177: Photo Albums
178: Forums
179: Your Account
180: Forums
181: Forums
182: Forums
183: Forums
184: Photo Albums
185: Home
186: Photo Albums
187: Forums
188: Forums
189: Forums
190: Your Account
191: Home
192: Forums
193: Photo Albums
194: Forums
195: Your Account
196: Forums
197: Forums
198: Forums
199: Forums
200: Forums
201: Forums
202: Forums
203: Forums
204: Forums
205: Forums
206: Forums
207: Forums
208: Forums
209: Home
210: Forums
211: Forums
212: Forums
213: Your Account
214: Photo Albums
215: Home
216: Forums
217: Forums
218: Photo Albums
219: Forums
220: Your Account
221: Forums
222: Forums
223: Forums
224: Your Account
225: Photo Albums
226: Forums
227: Your Account
228: Forums
229: Forums
230: Your Account
231: Forums
232: Forums
233: Forums
234: Forums
235: Forums
236: Forums
237: Forums
238: Forums
239: Forums
240: News
241: Your Account
242: Photo Albums
243: Forums
244: Forums
245: Forums
246: Forums
247: Photo Albums
248: Forums
249: Forums
250: Forums
251: Forums
252: Forums
253: Forums
254: Your Account
255: Forums
256: Your Account
257: Forums
258: Your Account
259: Forums
260: Photo Albums
261: Forums
262: Your Account
263: Forums
264: Forums
265: Forums
266: Your Account
267: Forums
268: Forums
269: Forums
270: Photo Albums
271: Forums
272: Forums
273: Home
274: Forums
275: Forums
276: Forums
277: Forums
278: Your Account
279: Forums
280: Forums
281: Forums
282: Forums
283: Your Account
284: Forums
285: Your Account
286: Forums
287: Forums
288: Forums
289: Forums
290: Forums
291: Forums
292: Your Account
293: Forums
294: Forums
295: Forums
296: Forums
297: Forums
298: Forums
299: Home
300: Your Account
301: Forums
302: Photo Albums
303: Home
304: Forums
305: Forums
306: Forums
307: Home
308: Forums
309: Home
310: Your Account
311: Your Account
312: Forums
313: Your Account
314: Forums
315: Photo Albums
316: Forums
317: Forums
318: Forums
319: Forums
320: Forums
321: Forums
322: Home
323: Forums
324: Your Account
325: Your Account
326: Your Account
327: Forums
328: Your Account
329: Your Account
330: Forums
331: Forums
332: Forums
333: Forums
334: Your Account
335: Photo Albums
336: Forums
337: Forums
338: Forums
339: Forums
340: Forums
341: Forums
342: Home
343: Forums
344: Home
345: Forums
346: Forums
347: Forums
348: Home
349: Photo Albums
350: Your Account
351: Forums
352: Photo Albums
353: Photo Albums
354: Forums
355: Forums
356: Forums
357: Home
358: Forums
359: Forums
360: Forums
361: Your Account
362: Forums
363: Forums
364: Forums
365: Forums
366: Photo Albums
367: Your Account
368: Your Account
369: Your Account
370: Forums
371: Forums
372: Forums
373: Forums
374: Your Account
375: Your Account
376: Home
377: Forums
378: Forums
379: Forums
380: Forums
381: Forums
382: Forums
383: Your Account
384: Forums
385: Your Account
386: Your Account
387: Forums
388: Home
389: Forums
390: Forums
391: Photo Albums
392: Forums
393: Home
394: Your Account
395: Your Account
396: Your Account
397: Forums
398: Forums
399: Forums
400: Forums
401: Forums
402: Forums
403: Your Account
404: Forums
405: Your Account
406: Forums
407: Your Account
408: Photo Albums
409: Forums
410: Forums
411: Forums
412: Forums
413: News
414: Photo Albums
415: Forums
416: Forums
417: Your Account
418: Forums
419: Forums
420: Forums
421: Forums
422: Forums
423: Forums
424: Forums
425: Forums
426: Forums
427: Forums
428: Forums
429: Forums
430: Photo Albums
431: Home
432: Photo Albums
433: Forums
434: Forums
435: Forums
436: Forums
437: Forums
438: Forums
439: Forums
440: Forums
441: Forums
442: Your Account
443: Forums
444: Forums
445: Forums
446: Your Account
447: Forums
448: Forums
449: Forums
450: Statistics
451: Photo Albums
452: Home
453: Your Account
454: Photo Albums
455: Forums
456: Forums
457: Forums
458: Forums
459: Home
460: Forums
461: Forums
462: Your Account
463: Forums
464: Forums
465: Forums
466: Your Account
467: Forums
468: Your Account
469: Forums
470: Forums
471: Forums
472: Forums
473: Forums
474: Your Account
475: Forums
476: Photo Albums
477: Photo Albums
478: Forums
479: Forums
480: Forums
481: Forums
482: Your Account
483: Home
484: Forums
485: Forums
486: Your Account
487: Forums
488: Your Account
489: Your Account
490: Forums
491: Forums
492: Forums
493: Forums
494: Forums
495: Forums
496: Photo Albums
497: Home
498: Forums
499: Forums
500: Forums
501: Forums
502: Forums
503: Home
504: Photo Albums
505: Forums
506: Home
507: Your Account
508: Forums
509: Forums
510: Forums
511: Forums
512: Home
513: Forums
514: Forums
515: Forums
516: Forums
517: Forums
518: Photo Albums
519: Forums
520: Photo Albums
521: Forums
522: Forums
523: Forums
524: Forums
525: Forums
526: Forums
527: Forums
528: Forums
529: Forums
530: Forums
531: Forums
532: Forums
533: Forums
534: Your Account
535: Your Account
536: Forums
537: Your Account
538: Your Account
539: Forums
540: Forums
541: Forums
542: Forums
543: Forums
544: Forums
545: Forums
546: Forums
547: Forums
548: Forums
549: Forums
550: Forums
551: Forums
552: Your Account
  BOT:
01: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 308
 Pictures: 2451
  · Views: 820725
  · Votes: 1316
  · Comments: 86
 

.243 cal. ?
Discussions related to Guns and Firearms
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SwampFox
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jul 15, 2005
Posts: 1040
Location: Destin, Florida

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 11:51 am    Post subject: Re: .243 cal. ? Reply with quote

Glockman,
The 243 is a fine round. I just like the 260 better due to bullet weight selection. That is the reason I do not own a "put together" 243 at this moment. If you have not bought the 243 yet, take a look at a 260 with a 1-8 twist barrel.

If you have the 243, the answer is that it can be used for dogs to deer without a problem. So you are good to go in both directions.
Ed

_________________
The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of the blessings. The inherent blessing of socialism is the equal sharing of misery.
-Winston Churchill
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Pumpkinslinger
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Sep 22, 2007
Posts: 5001
Location: NC foothills

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 3:49 pm    Post subject: Re: .243 cal. ? Reply with quote

Like SwampFox I picked a .260 over the .243 because of bullet selection. But keep in mind I was looking more for a "light deer gun" than a "varmint gun".

Friends who shoot .243s seem to love them.

_________________
Mike

"I ain't no better than anybody else, and there ain't nobody better than me!" Ma Kettle
Back to top
View user's profile AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
glockman55
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Dec 12, 2005
Posts: 831
Location: Michigan

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 4:15 pm    Post subject: Re: .243 cal. ? Reply with quote

Thanks Guys, I just thought I would try to pick a cal. that would work for a few different applications. and another excuse to buy another cal. I do have a 30-30 and a 7 mag. and would like to get a .270 or .280 some day too. You can never have enough. Laughing

_________________
Are you boys gonna pull them pistols or whistle dixie?
Back to top
View user's profile Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
MGKelly
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Feb 06, 2008
Posts: 24
Location: G. R. Michigan

PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 8:32 pm    Post subject: .243 cal. Conversion Idea Reply with quote

Hi all,

I'm new here but I couldn't resist the .243 thread, so heres my bone-head/pipe-dream idea for the Ishapore 2A1 (stripped down for a TAC/Sniper role) wtf

I'm guessing were talking about the .243WIN cartridge? The case has near identical dimentions as the .308WIN except for the smaller neck. I have an Ishapore 2A1 (7.62x51 NATO) that with only a barrel change these rifles would be easily converted to .243WIN. Since the rifles are manufactured to modern specs and swapping in a new barrel will only strengthen them, you could really find out what that .243 will do! The action length is the perfect fit, and I can cycle .243 snap-caps through the .308 action with out a hic-up, which means the original magazines will work with out any modifications!

Anyways just a thought... Shiner

M. G.

_________________
Doing the "right" thing for the wrong reason is still wrong.

PETA: People for the Eating of Tasty Animals

Euthanasia: Viet Nam
Euthanmideast: Iraq
Back to top
View user's profile
Pumpkinslinger
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Sep 22, 2007
Posts: 5001
Location: NC foothills

PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:57 pm    Post subject: Re: .243 cal. ? Reply with quote

MGKelly, take a look at the .260 Rem. Its a .308 necked down to .264 and, in my opinion, is more versatile than the .243.

_________________
Mike

"I ain't no better than anybody else, and there ain't nobody better than me!" Ma Kettle
Back to top
View user's profile AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
MGKelly
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Feb 06, 2008
Posts: 24
Location: G. R. Michigan

PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 10:14 pm    Post subject: Re: .243 cal. ? Reply with quote

Pumpkinslinger wrote:
MGKelly, take a look at the .260 Rem. Its a .308 necked down to .264 and, in my opinion, is more versatile than the .243.

If the cartridge OAL and dimentions are close enough on the Remmington as it is on most all of the .xxxWIN series I'm sure it would be no problem the 2A1 has an action length just made for the .243-.270-.308 WIN family of rifle ammo. Being a believer in delivering more PROJECTILE downrange whenever possible the .260 does make more sense. The .308 isn't known for its "ultraflat" trajectory, I wonder how flat and how fast you could get a .260 to go (safely, that is).

M. G. Confused

_________________
Doing the "right" thing for the wrong reason is still wrong.

PETA: People for the Eating of Tasty Animals

Euthanasia: Viet Nam
Euthanmideast: Iraq
Back to top
View user's profile
1895ss
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jul 21, 2005
Posts: 2612
Location: Not Here...!!

PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 11:11 pm    Post subject: Re: .243 cal. ? Reply with quote

MGKelly wrote:
I wonder how flat and how fast you could get a .260 to go (safely, that is).M. G. Confused

Aprox 3100 fps (100 gr) to 2600 fps (160 gr)

data.hodgdon.com/cartridge_load.asp
data.hodgdon.com/cartridge_load.asp

_________________
A cruel truth is much more desirable than a really nice lie.
'Tis far better to walk alone than to follow a crowd or an a**hole going the wrong way.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
SingleShotLover
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Dec 26, 2007
Posts: 1005
Location: Illinois

PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 5:14 am    Post subject: Re: .243 cal. ? Reply with quote

Although countless deer, antelope and more than a few black bear have been killed with most of the 6MMs (.243 Winchester, 6MM Remington etc.) and I have shot a few deer and many coyotes using the .243. I am just not comfortable with any cartridges for medium to large game under .25 caliber. This is only a personal prejudice and anyone who dotes on these cartridges is welcome to do so. The .243 can be brilliantly accurate and a great coyote gun (though maybe a bit hard on pelts). If used for deer, premium bullets in the 90 to 100-grain range should be used and shots taken carefully.

A further consideration is for the handloader: The .243 Winchester is said to occasionally show unpredictable pressure spikes even with safe loads. I have never experienced this but it is an issue to be considered.

_________________
If you can't hit it with one, you probably can't with two either!

The biggest problem with a closed mind is that it never seems to come with a closed mouth.

SSL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
MGKelly
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Feb 06, 2008
Posts: 24
Location: G. R. Michigan

PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 6:56 am    Post subject: Re: .243 cal. ? Reply with quote

I believe it has to do with what it is one is trying to accomplish, the military is a good example of how one's thinking can change (albeit SLOWLY) over the years. Sleep

Since the early 1900's the cartridge to beat was the .30, (30.06 to be more exact) and served until the early 1960's, but we haven't fought any trench or wide open shooting wars in a while. Then we went the opposite direction to .223 and have used that for near 40 years (with a blend of 7.62 mixed in: M-60, M14). Most combat takes place at 100 yards or less and 30.06 is just a little over powered (if you could get the bad guys to stand singlefile facing you while you shoot them you could get at least 6 of 'em at a time!) and unless it's chambered in a relatively heavy rifle (M-1) the recoil leaves a bit to be desired. I don't have a lot of faith in the 5.56mm either, yes I know they are capable of one shot/one kill performance, but I just like being able to throw bigger rocks than my fellow caveman. Laughing

Now they're looking at 6.8 SPC and some other 6.x stuff and best of all: finaly considering dumping that confounded gas tube for a gas piston system (the AR rifles have needed a gas piston since day one) maybe now the AR will be accurate, clean, and reliable. ...but thats another story.

Military requirements aren't all that different from sporting requirements though; you need a cartridge/rifle with enough bullet, enough speed, flat trajectory, and low enough recoil for an accurate followup shot if necessary... oh, yeah, and do it every time!

...and then there's the shooters... Nananana



Who knows, maybe the 6mm family of ammo can do it with the right combination of case , powder, and bullet design. It's worth watching.

M. G.

_________________
Doing the "right" thing for the wrong reason is still wrong.

PETA: People for the Eating of Tasty Animals

Euthanasia: Viet Nam
Euthanmideast: Iraq
Back to top
View user's profile
Dimitri
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Nov 25, 2005
Posts: 5944

PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 2:18 pm    Post subject: Re: .243 cal. ? Reply with quote

MGKelly wrote:
Now they're looking at 6.8 SPC and some other 6.x stuff and best of all: finaly considering dumping that confounded gas tube for a gas piston system (the AR rifles have needed a gas piston since day one) maybe now the AR will be accurate, clean, and reliable.

I wouldn't count on ether happening any time soon. Both have been looked at but don't provide enough of a benefit to make a switch from the reports I've read. Smile

The AR family of rifles seems to be doing well, considering the Army recently adopted the XM110 sniper rifles, a AR based rifle in 308Win without a piston. And the Navy's been using them for their SEALS for a long time, and the Marines have purchased more of the Navy units. Smile

Nevermind the countless Special Forces units world wide which prefer and use the AR-15 series of rifles verses the alternatives such as the HK G36, Styer AUG, SA80, SIG 550 etc which most of them ARE indeed piston gas system firearms.

Dimitri

_________________
A thousand hills, but no birds in flight, ten thousand paths, with no people's tracks. A lonely boat, a straw-hatted old man, fishing alone in the cold river snow.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
MGKelly
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Feb 06, 2008
Posts: 24
Location: G. R. Michigan

PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:19 pm    Post subject: Re: .243 cal. ? Reply with quote

I don't have fond memories of 16A1's and A2's, especially after long engagements with numerous bursts of full auto mixed in. The carbon-crud would just run out of the bottom of the receiver and the mag-well almost like water. When they did malfunction half the battle was trying to find the location of the problem due to the thick even grayish coating everything had from the gas tube blasting all the fouling straight into the receiver, magazine, and trigger group. When we cleaned them we dunked them in big drums of parts cleaner to get the thickest crud off, then we finished cleaning in the normal fashion. Confused

It doesn't suprise me that XM110 was accepted, in the sniper role the need to hose down an area on full auto doesn't arise too often. As a sniper you take a couple of shots and its off to find a new hide, because the rifle is fired less often means it is easier to keep clean so the fact it's not a piston driven action in this case would not have a lot of bearing on the choice.

The piston rifles have their drawbacks too...

I find the need for a recoil-buffer in both my SKS and WASR, and is essentially is for the optics. My SKS has a receiver-cover scope mount which fits perfectly and maintains zero, the buffer is installed to protect the scope from the "impact" of the bolt carrier/bolt assy. when it hits the rear of the receiver. I find the same thing in my AK clone, even though it has a siderail receiver mount when that boltcarrier/bolt hits the rear of the receiver, with out the buffers the optics would die an early death.

...and no, the recoil buffers don't really do much to reduce "felt recoil", they just protect the innerparts from beatting each other up.

Sorry, it's late and I'm blathering on... Point

gotta catch some sacktime!

Have a good one all,

M. G.

_________________
Doing the "right" thing for the wrong reason is still wrong.

PETA: People for the Eating of Tasty Animals

Euthanasia: Viet Nam
Euthanmideast: Iraq
Back to top
View user's profile
alaskanativeson
Member
Member


Joined: Mar 02, 2008
Posts: 30
Location: Rural Alaska

PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 4:11 pm    Post subject: Re: .243 cal. ? Reply with quote

SingleShotLover wrote:
...I am just not comfortable with any cartridges for medium to large game under .25 caliber...

I have to agree with this one. I see that a few people here have said the .243 is a good for elk. That is, of course, their choice to make. For myself I'd consider I was being unethical going after elk with a .243, they're just not enough of a cartridge for game that size. I'd consider it for mulies but only if I was going for antlerless. Can you kill an elk or a big mule deer with a .243? Yes. However I don't like having to rely on luck as one of my factors any more than I must.

I remember an article written by Bob Milek in Guns and Ammo magazine where he talked about the .243. He said when it first came out he thought he had the finest cartridge ever made, the magical thunderbolt from the hand of Zeus. When he had several years more experience losing elk at relatively close range with what he KNEW to be good solid hits he decided that it wasn't enough gun for the big wapiti. I'll agree with him.

_________________
Freedom isn't free - My taxes prove that!
Back to top
View user's profile
Morax
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Dec 18, 2006
Posts: 618
Location: Pittsburgh Pa

PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 4:40 pm    Post subject: Re: .243 cal. ? Reply with quote

from up close and personal experiance with a elk on a motorcycle (how he got the helmet on i donno) and also owning a .243 I would never go after an elk with it.. biggest i would go would be a larger end mule deer and that wouldnt be at extreme distance. from whitetail down though i would the .243 with no questions asked..
Back to top
View user's profile
MGKelly
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Feb 06, 2008
Posts: 24
Location: G. R. Michigan

PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 4:12 am    Post subject: Re: .243 cal. ? Reply with quote

Morax wrote:
from up close and personal experiance with a elk on a motorcycle (how he got the helmet on i donno) and also owning a .243...

Yeah, gettin' them helmets on them elk aint no easy matter, but the elk had a .243 too? I though it was only legal to Keep and Arm Bears! Confused

(Sorry, couldn't resist!)

The .243 is a great cartridge, very versatile, and I agree there is a certain upper-limit to what you can reliably take with it. I want enough bullet on target to do enough damage to the vitals to drop my target right about where I shot it. I say it that way cause over the years I've had to track or help track a few that refused to fall down when shot (no fun). At least one of those was a great heart/lung shot but my friend was using a .243 (soft-tip), he had shot a solid good sized 7 point, the bullet didn't seem to expand either (small exit hole). We tracked him probably 300-400yds, seemed like 400miles, in swampy Michigan scrub/jack pine, in the dark,

...up hill both ways! Laughing

Probably a lil off topic, has anyone seen the articles in some of the gun rags about deer hunting with the 5.56mm(AR)? I know folks do it, but it just seems a little too much on the small size. The only reason it's good at killing humans is because of the way it bounces around inside, not a good attribute for hunting I would think. Maybe a new thread?

M.G.

_________________
Doing the "right" thing for the wrong reason is still wrong.

PETA: People for the Eating of Tasty Animals

Euthanasia: Viet Nam
Euthanmideast: Iraq
Back to top
View user's profile
Morax
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Dec 18, 2006
Posts: 618
Location: Pittsburgh Pa

PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:47 am    Post subject: Re: .243 cal. ? Reply with quote

MGK i agree and i am a very big propnant FOR the 243, but its like everything out there, if you as a hunter,owner,user, its up to you to feel compfy with what you are using for the critter you are going after, being undergunned is worse than missing with something bigger than needed!! where i hunt the 243 is more than enough for the whitetails and the g-hogs, but now if i go into the woods deeper i want something with a bit more a$$ behind it..
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Gun & Firearm Discussions
Page 2 of 3
All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by *Dizfunkshunal* :.