HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous


Membership:
Latest: CharlesSipe
New Today: 1
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 12670

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 269
BOT: 2
Total: 271
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Forums
02: Forums
03: Forums
04: Forums
05: Forums
06: Forums
07: Forums
08: Forums
09: Photo Albums
10: Forums
11: Forums
12: Home
13: Home
14: Forums
15: Photo Albums
16: Forums
17: Photo Albums
18: Statistics
19: Photo Albums
20: Statistics
21: Home
22: Statistics
23: Photo Albums
24: Statistics
25: Photo Albums
26: Statistics
27: Forums
28: Forums
29: Forums
30: Forums
31: Forums
32: Forums
33: Forums
34: Your Account
35: Forums
36: Statistics
37: Statistics
38: Statistics
39: Forums
40: Forums
41: Your Account
42: Statistics
43: Forums
44: Statistics
45: Statistics
46: Statistics
47: Forums
48: Forums
49: Statistics
50: Forums
51: Forums
52: Forums
53: Forums
54: Statistics
55: Statistics
56: Forums
57: Photo Albums
58: Forums
59: Statistics
60: Forums
61: Statistics
62: Statistics
63: Forums
64: Statistics
65: Forums
66: Forums
67: Statistics
68: Home
69: Forums
70: Forums
71: Photo Albums
72: Statistics
73: Forums
74: Forums
75: Your Account
76: Statistics
77: Forums
78: Statistics
79: Statistics
80: Forums
81: Forums
82: Forums
83: Photo Albums
84: Forums
85: Forums
86: Statistics
87: Statistics
88: Photo Albums
89: Forums
90: Forums
91: Photo Albums
92: Forums
93: Forums
94: Photo Albums
95: Forums
96: Forums
97: Photo Albums
98: Statistics
99: Photo Albums
100: Forums
101: Photo Albums
102: Forums
103: Forums
104: Forums
105: Forums
106: Forums
107: Forums
108: Your Account
109: Forums
110: Forums
111: Forums
112: Forums
113: Photo Albums
114: Forums
115: Photo Albums
116: Forums
117: Forums
118: Forums
119: Forums
120: Forums
121: Forums
122: Forums
123: Your Account
124: Forums
125: Forums
126: Statistics
127: Photo Albums
128: Photo Albums
129: Home
130: Your Account
131: Forums
132: Home
133: Forums
134: Forums
135: Statistics
136: Your Account
137: Forums
138: Photo Albums
139: Photo Albums
140: Forums
141: Photo Albums
142: Forums
143: Forums
144: Forums
145: Forums
146: Forums
147: News
148: Forums
149: Home
150: Forums
151: Forums
152: Forums
153: Forums
154: Forums
155: Forums
156: Your Account
157: Statistics
158: Statistics
159: Statistics
160: Statistics
161: Forums
162: Statistics
163: Statistics
164: Forums
165: Forums
166: Forums
167: Photo Albums
168: Home
169: Statistics
170: Forums
171: Statistics
172: Forums
173: Forums
174: Forums
175: Forums
176: Forums
177: Forums
178: Forums
179: Forums
180: Forums
181: Forums
182: Statistics
183: Forums
184: Photo Albums
185: Forums
186: Forums
187: Photo Albums
188: Forums
189: Forums
190: Home
191: Forums
192: Forums
193: Forums
194: Forums
195: Forums
196: Forums
197: Forums
198: Forums
199: Forums
200: Forums
201: Forums
202: Forums
203: Forums
204: Forums
205: Forums
206: Forums
207: Forums
208: Forums
209: Photo Albums
210: Forums
211: Photo Albums
212: Forums
213: Forums
214: Forums
215: Forums
216: Forums
217: Forums
218: Forums
219: Photo Albums
220: Your Account
221: Forums
222: Forums
223: Forums
224: Forums
225: Forums
226: Forums
227: Statistics
228: Forums
229: Forums
230: Statistics
231: Forums
232: Forums
233: Forums
234: Forums
235: Statistics
236: Forums
237: Your Account
238: Forums
239: Statistics
240: Statistics
241: Statistics
242: Statistics
243: Statistics
244: Statistics
245: Forums
246: Your Account
247: Statistics
248: Statistics
249: Photo Albums
250: Statistics
251: Statistics
252: Statistics
253: Statistics
254: Statistics
255: Forums
256: Forums
257: Forums
258: Your Account
259: Forums
260: Forums
261: Forums
262: Forums
263: Forums
264: Forums
265: Forums
266: Forums
267: Forums
268: Forums
269: Forums
  BOT:
01: Your Account
02: Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 305
 Pictures: 2366
  · Views: 495800
  · Votes: 1312
  · Comments: 86
 

Support our Advertisers

Ballistic Coefficient (BC) Testing and Analysis
Discussions related to Guns and Firearms
Go to page Previous  1, 2
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
DallanC
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: Jan 18, 2005
Posts: 3230
Location: Utah

PostPosted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:42 pm    Post subject: Re: Ballistic Coefficient (BC) Testing and Analysis Reply with quote

I find it a little wierd on a website created for a specific ballistics software, to see links to competitors software. Ah well I guess.

Anyway Sierra feels BC should be bracketed depending on velocity. For a specific bullet there are usually 3 BC values depending on velocity. I've had more than a few requests to update PointBlank to support this... but as they are the only MFG to my knowledge using multiple BCs, I've never found it worth the effort.

Also, why does no-one talk about bullet deformation due to different rifling configurations? A BC is only good for a specific barrel. Riflings cut deeper or shallower will deform a bullet in different ways, affecting the overall shape of the bullet, which in turn affects BC.

Ever looked at the bore of a Newton rifle?


-DallanC
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
PaulS
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Posts: 3635
Location: South-Eastern Washington - the State

PostPosted: Sat Jun 17, 2017 2:48 pm    Post subject: Re: Ballistic Coefficient (BC) Testing and Analysis Reply with quote

The published ballistic coefficients are corrected for altitude, barometric pressure and zero humidity. If they weren't then the BC would be meaningless. Using a G1 BC in Point Blank and other good software adjust the "working BC" for the altitude and other parameters that exist when and where you shoot.
You got a BC calculated at 1800 feet with 29.40 pressure and 45% humidity then it would have to be lowered at sea level at 29.91 pressure and 60% humidity to match the trajectory there. If I used your calculated BC (while assuming it was corrected to sea level standard atmosphere using Point Blank at 2000 feet above sea level and 80F with 10% humidity the software would come up with nonsense because the software would reduce the friction for my 2000 feet and higher temperature while increasing the drag for the low humidity.
Dallan shows reason for more deviations in BC and how about the tipped bullets that overheat and melt away in flight? That will give a lower BC than if you fired the same bullet at a lower velocity even under the same environmental conditions.
The BC provided by a manufacturer has to be corrected to the standard atmospheric conditions to be meaningful when used in software under different conditions or you get garbage out. The software you use might make those conversions but it might not too. Before using measured or calculated BC for reference there must be a reference point. The standard atmosphere is the "normal" reference point for BCs.

_________________
Paul
__________________
Speer, Lyman, Hodgdon, Sierra, and Hornady = reliable loading data
So and So's pages on the internet = NOT reliable loading data
Always check data against manuals
NEVER exceed maximum listed loads
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Elvis
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: 7729
Location: south island New Zealand

PostPosted: Sat Jun 17, 2017 3:18 pm    Post subject: Re: Ballistic Coefficient (BC) Testing and Analysis Reply with quote

shooting a 130-180grn projectile at 2900-3000fps at 0-350 yards
you sight in to be 3" high at 100 yards and forget all the other B.S. and just go shoot you some deer.
yip the flat or round nose jobbie wont hold up as good as the sleak splitzer with superduper arodynanically designed nose cone and moly coating to make it slipperyer than a whores drawers
BUT crunch the numbers on my 170grn RNFB speers going say 2800fps from my .270 and you will see what I mean..at the sub 300 yard range where lets face it 90% of animals are shot,the difference is sweet stuff all.

_________________
You shot it You pluck it !
Them who eats the most duck eats the most feathers!
Back to top
View user's profile
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7778
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Sat Jun 17, 2017 3:43 pm    Post subject: Re: Ballistic Coefficient (BC) Testing and Analysis Reply with quote

DallanC wrote:
I find it a little wierd on a website created for a specific ballistics software, to see links to competitors software.

Dallan, my apologies. The computer I use cannot have any software apps loaded on it that are not approved. Thus I use on-line ballistic calculators. If you have any suggestions to reference Pointblank, I'm open. I just doing have any experience with it.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7778
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Sat Jun 17, 2017 3:47 pm    Post subject: Re: Ballistic Coefficient (BC) Testing and Analysis Reply with quote

PaulS wrote:
The published ballistic coefficients are corrected for altitude, barometric pressure and zero humidity. If they weren't then the BC would be meaningless.

PaulS, I thought I explained that the BC derived from this testing were corrected for altitude, barometric pressure and humidity. One also has to correct for temperature and winds. You are correct, in the situation where I didn't have accurate altitude, barometric pressure, and humidity, the BCs were meaningless.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7778
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Sun Jun 18, 2017 7:32 am    Post subject: Re: Ballistic Coefficient (BC) Testing and Analysis Reply with quote

Elvis wrote:
BUT crunch the numbers on my 170grn RNFB speers going say 2800fps from my .270

Elvis, the 150s I shoot out of my .270 are pretty stout at 2800 fps. What powder are you using to get a 170gr to 2800 fps?

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile
Elvis
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: 7729
Location: south island New Zealand

PostPosted: Sun Jun 18, 2017 10:51 pm    Post subject: Re: Ballistic Coefficient (BC) Testing and Analysis Reply with quote

pushing them with ar3312 and a couple of grains over book max 54grns..... as for how fast they going........ dont own a chrony.

_________________
You shot it You pluck it !
Them who eats the most duck eats the most feathers!
Back to top
View user's profile
Elvis
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: 7729
Location: south island New Zealand

PostPosted: Sun Jun 18, 2017 10:56 pm    Post subject: Re: Ballistic Coefficient (BC) Testing and Analysis Reply with quote

nick harvey has in text 56grns of 4831 for 2800fps...he had longer barrel and those early loads of his are hot.

_________________
You shot it You pluck it !
Them who eats the most duck eats the most feathers!
Back to top
View user's profile
PaulS
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Posts: 3635
Location: South-Eastern Washington - the State

PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 8:00 pm    Post subject: Re: Ballistic Coefficient (BC) Testing and Analysis Reply with quote

Slimjim,
You may have said it and I just missed it or forgot seeing it. Either way the BC has meaning under those conditions for you. If the software does it all and gives you the corrected number then it is golden!

_________________
Paul
__________________
Speer, Lyman, Hodgdon, Sierra, and Hornady = reliable loading data
So and So's pages on the internet = NOT reliable loading data
Always check data against manuals
NEVER exceed maximum listed loads
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7778
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Wed Jun 21, 2017 5:33 am    Post subject: Re: Ballistic Coefficient (BC) Testing and Analysis Reply with quote

PaulS, with my test results consistent with Applied Ballistic and repeatable, it gives me confidence the process is working.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile
hunterjoe21
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Mar 30, 2007
Posts: 1446
Location: Billings, Montana

PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2018 11:50 pm    Post subject: Re: Ballistic Coefficient (BC) Testing and Analysis Reply with quote

Bump

_________________
My 1911 is more effective than your 911.
Back to top
View user's profile
PaulS
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Posts: 3635
Location: South-Eastern Washington - the State

PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2018 4:12 pm    Post subject: Re: Ballistic Coefficient (BC) Testing and Analysis Reply with quote

I am using a LabRadar chronograph and it provides velocity at every pulse so I have the information I need to calculate the BC of any bullet I use. With all the complementary information provided I am surprised that the firmware doesn't calculate the BC for me. Smile
I have a number of ballistic programs and the two I use most often are Point Blank and my own that I wrote for DOS many years ago. The traces from te two pieces of software are so close out to 300 yards that for all practical purposes they are the same. My software is less accurate with pistol bullets than Point Blank so when I want to predict path for my pistol rounds I always use Point Blank - even though I have to use my wife's computer to do it- hers is the only one that runs Windows OS.

_________________
Paul
__________________
Speer, Lyman, Hodgdon, Sierra, and Hornady = reliable loading data
So and So's pages on the internet = NOT reliable loading data
Always check data against manuals
NEVER exceed maximum listed loads
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7778
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2018 7:47 pm    Post subject: Re: Ballistic Coefficient (BC) Testing and Analysis Reply with quote

PaulS wrote:
I am surprised that the firmware doesn't calculate the BC for me.

To get an accurate BC, the unit would also have to measure all the environmentals, e.g., temperature, humidity, barometric pressure, altitude, and wind.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Gun & Firearm Discussions
Page 2 of 2
All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Advertisements
 


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by Dizfunkshunal :.