HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous


Membership:
Latest: RichardZ
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 1
Overall: 13126

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 457
BOT: 1
Total: 458
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Forums
02: Photo Albums
03: Photo Albums
04: Forums
05: Forums
06: Home
07: Forums
08: Photo Albums
09: Photo Albums
10: Home
11: Photo Albums
12: Forums
13: Forums
14: Your Account
15: Forums
16: Home
17: Forums
18: Forums
19: Photo Albums
20: Forums
21: Forums
22: Forums
23: Forums
24: Home
25: Your Account
26: Forums
27: Your Account
28: Forums
29: Forums
30: Forums
31: Forums
32: Photo Albums
33: Forums
34: Forums
35: Forums
36: Forums
37: Forums
38: Forums
39: Forums
40: Your Account
41: Forums
42: Photo Albums
43: Home
44: Forums
45: Forums
46: Forums
47: Forums
48: Forums
49: Forums
50: Forums
51: Your Account
52: Forums
53: Photo Albums
54: Your Account
55: Forums
56: Forums
57: Forums
58: Forums
59: Home
60: Your Account
61: Forums
62: Forums
63: Home
64: Forums
65: Home
66: Forums
67: Forums
68: Forums
69: Forums
70: Your Account
71: Forums
72: Photo Albums
73: Forums
74: Forums
75: Forums
76: Photo Albums
77: Your Account
78: Forums
79: Forums
80: Your Account
81: Forums
82: Your Account
83: Your Account
84: Forums
85: Forums
86: Home
87: Forums
88: Your Account
89: Your Account
90: Forums
91: Forums
92: Forums
93: Forums
94: Forums
95: Forums
96: Forums
97: Forums
98: Home
99: Home
100: Forums
101: Forums
102: Your Account
103: Forums
104: Forums
105: Forums
106: Forums
107: Forums
108: Forums
109: Your Account
110: Photo Albums
111: Home
112: Forums
113: Forums
114: Forums
115: Forums
116: Forums
117: Your Account
118: Forums
119: Forums
120: Forums
121: Your Account
122: Your Account
123: Forums
124: Forums
125: Forums
126: Your Account
127: Forums
128: Forums
129: Forums
130: Forums
131: Forums
132: Forums
133: Home
134: Forums
135: Forums
136: Home
137: Home
138: Home
139: Forums
140: Forums
141: Forums
142: Forums
143: Forums
144: Photo Albums
145: Forums
146: Photo Albums
147: Forums
148: Forums
149: Forums
150: Forums
151: Your Account
152: Forums
153: Forums
154: Forums
155: Your Account
156: Forums
157: Forums
158: Home
159: Forums
160: Home
161: Forums
162: Forums
163: Forums
164: Forums
165: Forums
166: Your Account
167: Photo Albums
168: Your Account
169: Forums
170: Forums
171: Forums
172: Forums
173: Forums
174: Home
175: Photo Albums
176: Home
177: Forums
178: Forums
179: Forums
180: Forums
181: Forums
182: Forums
183: Forums
184: Forums
185: Your Account
186: Forums
187: Forums
188: Forums
189: Forums
190: Your Account
191: Forums
192: News
193: Forums
194: Forums
195: Your Account
196: Forums
197: Forums
198: Your Account
199: Forums
200: Forums
201: Forums
202: Forums
203: Your Account
204: News
205: Forums
206: Forums
207: Forums
208: Forums
209: Forums
210: Forums
211: Forums
212: Forums
213: Forums
214: Forums
215: Home
216: Forums
217: Forums
218: Forums
219: Photo Albums
220: Photo Albums
221: Photo Albums
222: Your Account
223: Forums
224: Forums
225: Forums
226: Forums
227: Your Account
228: Forums
229: Forums
230: Photo Albums
231: Forums
232: Forums
233: Forums
234: Photo Albums
235: Forums
236: Photo Albums
237: Forums
238: Forums
239: Your Account
240: Forums
241: Forums
242: Forums
243: Forums
244: Forums
245: Forums
246: Forums
247: Forums
248: Forums
249: Photo Albums
250: Forums
251: Forums
252: Forums
253: Home
254: Forums
255: Forums
256: Your Account
257: Forums
258: Forums
259: Your Account
260: Photo Albums
261: Forums
262: Forums
263: Your Account
264: Photo Albums
265: Forums
266: Forums
267: Photo Albums
268: Home
269: Photo Albums
270: Forums
271: Forums
272: Your Account
273: Forums
274: Forums
275: Photo Albums
276: Forums
277: Your Account
278: Forums
279: Forums
280: Home
281: Forums
282: Forums
283: Forums
284: Forums
285: Forums
286: Home
287: Forums
288: Forums
289: Forums
290: Forums
291: Forums
292: Home
293: Home
294: Home
295: Home
296: Home
297: Forums
298: Home
299: Forums
300: Forums
301: Forums
302: Forums
303: Forums
304: Forums
305: Forums
306: Forums
307: Forums
308: Forums
309: Forums
310: Photo Albums
311: Your Account
312: Forums
313: Forums
314: Forums
315: Forums
316: Forums
317: Forums
318: Forums
319: Forums
320: Your Account
321: Your Account
322: Forums
323: Forums
324: Home
325: Forums
326: Forums
327: Forums
328: Forums
329: Forums
330: Your Account
331: Forums
332: Forums
333: Forums
334: Photo Albums
335: Forums
336: Photo Albums
337: Your Account
338: Forums
339: Forums
340: Forums
341: Forums
342: Your Account
343: Forums
344: Forums
345: Forums
346: Forums
347: Forums
348: Your Account
349: Forums
350: Forums
351: Forums
352: Forums
353: Forums
354: Forums
355: Forums
356: Forums
357: Forums
358: Forums
359: Home
360: Forums
361: Forums
362: Forums
363: Home
364: Forums
365: Your Account
366: Home
367: Forums
368: Forums
369: Forums
370: Forums
371: Home
372: Forums
373: Forums
374: Forums
375: Forums
376: Your Account
377: Forums
378: Forums
379: Forums
380: Your Account
381: Forums
382: Forums
383: Forums
384: Forums
385: Forums
386: Home
387: Forums
388: Your Account
389: Forums
390: Photo Albums
391: Forums
392: Home
393: Forums
394: Photo Albums
395: Your Account
396: Photo Albums
397: Your Account
398: Forums
399: Forums
400: Forums
401: Your Account
402: Forums
403: Home
404: Photo Albums
405: Forums
406: Forums
407: Forums
408: Forums
409: Your Account
410: Forums
411: Forums
412: Forums
413: Forums
414: Forums
415: Forums
416: Forums
417: Photo Albums
418: Forums
419: Your Account
420: Your Account
421: Forums
422: Forums
423: Forums
424: Forums
425: Home
426: Photo Albums
427: Home
428: Photo Albums
429: Forums
430: Forums
431: Forums
432: Home
433: Forums
434: Your Account
435: Home
436: Forums
437: Forums
438: Forums
439: Forums
440: Forums
441: Forums
442: Forums
443: Forums
444: Forums
445: Forums
446: Forums
447: Forums
448: Your Account
449: Forums
450: Forums
451: Forums
452: Forums
453: Forums
454: Home
455: Home
456: Forums
457: Forums
  BOT:
01: Photo Albums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 308
 Pictures: 2451
  · Views: 820723
  · Votes: 1316
  · Comments: 86
 

.44 Magnum durability
Discussions related to Guns and Firearms
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
roklok
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 11, 2005
Posts: 608
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska

PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:41 pm    Post subject: .44 Magnum durability Reply with quote

I shoot a lot of 44 magnum full power handloads { 240 gr in front of 22.2gr of 2400 } and have had problems with two different revolvers now. I had a Smith 629 that wouldnt stay timed and cylinder would rotate backwards under recoil. Then I bought a Ruger Super Blackhawk Bisley that I really like and had no problems until I cleaned it today after a shooting session and discovered that the forcing cone at rear of barrel was cracked about .25 inch. It had about 800 rounds through it. I'm wondering if my experience's are a fluke or if anybody else has had similar problems.Anybody out there have any experience with Ruger redhawk or super redhawk?Thought I might try one of them.Makes me wonder how long a 500 S&W Mag would hold up!!
Back to top
View user's profile
grimel
Member
Member


Joined: Jan 28, 2005
Posts: 160

PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 9:45 pm    Post subject: Re: .44 Magnum durability Reply with quote

Send the Ruger back to Ruger you got unlucky. Rugers are tanks. Rugers are the ONLY 44 Hamilton Bowen makes his 5 shot 44, 45, 475, etc.. The Ruger Redhawk (and SuperRedhawk) is the ONLY DA revolver I would use to shoot up max loads indefinitely. On second thought, the cone might be slightly out of alinement.

S&W 29's. These were never ment to eat a stead diet of heavy loads. Max 44spl loads with occasional use of 44mag heavy loads.

_________________
But.....ain't many troubles that a man caint fix
with seven hundred dollars and his thirty ought six.

Lindy Cooper Wisdom

Back to top
View user's profile
Handloader
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 22, 2005
Posts: 1032
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 11:54 pm    Post subject: Re: .44 Magnum durability Reply with quote

Model 29s would regularly shoot loose with a steady diet of Keith loads. Early 629s incorporated some improvements but were not as durable as the venerable Super Blackhawks or Dan Wessons. Current 629s incorporate the newest upgrade, the Endurance Package, and time will tell if it is effective. We've high return rates for warranty of Super Redhawks and, recently, Alaskans although the culprits here are mainly the 480s and 454s.

To date we have sold only a dozen X frame S&Ws but none have come back probably due to less extensive useage.

Years ago I bought a slightly used Freedom Arms Premiere in 454 Casull and a few years later a Ruger Vaquero in 45 Colt. Both get a lot of useage ( I estimate over 7,000 rounds through each) mostly with max loads and neither handgun has whimpered. My 44 Bisley has withstood max loads for thousands of rounds as well and still is in time and absent forcing cone or thrust issues. Some flame cutting is noted but not serious enough for concern.

General concensus is the Ruger is the toughest for the money but if the green stuff is a secondary issue there is no finer revolver than the Freedom Arms. It may be the finest revolver ever manufactured and is a pure joy to own and use.
Back to top
View user's profile
tbox61
Member
Member


Joined: Aug 31, 2005
Posts: 76
Location: Great Bend, KS

PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 8:27 am    Post subject: Re: .44 Magnum durability Reply with quote

Handloader,
My 8 3/8" 629 choked on 20 gr. of 2400 with a cast 240 gr. Keith style SWC. I had to get a hammer to tap the extractor to get the cases out. I have backed it off to 18.5 gr, and it works fine. I concur with you on the Rugers. I had a Super Blackhawk, 5 1/2" that would consistenly give higher velocities with the same load as my 629! Can you offer an explanation for that? Maybe tighter cylinder tolerance? Unfortunately, I traded the Ruger for a 17HMR, and I think I chose the wrong gun to barter!
Tim

_________________
There are 2 theories to arguing with a woman...neither works.
Will Rogers
Back to top
View user's profile
Al_Sohlstrom
Member
Member


Joined: Aug 30, 2005
Posts: 75

PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 1:16 pm    Post subject: Re: .44 Magnum durability Reply with quote

Hi

tbox61: About the brass stickage: Have you had the chambers chamfered and polished?

If so, please skip the rest of my post, here. If not, well - carry on!

My Taurus M44 used to hold on to high-compression .44 Mag. like a teenage boy with a month-old Playboy.

A bit of slow and careful Careful CAREFUL work with a B&D RTX Rotary Tool, a Dremel 427 Polishing Point and some Felt 1/2" Dremel Polish Wheels and some 3/8" Dremel 422 Polishing Tips with some plain old Simichrome metal polish gave me no burrs or sharpness on the edges of the chambers and slippery, mirror smooth chamber walls.

I can shoot some real wrist breakers, now, and they slip out, smooth and clean as... well... smooth as my chamber walls!

As for velocety: What's your cylinder gap look like? Got a feeler guage? NEED a feeler guage? (I have one on order....)

_________________
"Al's Postings," from the, "Good Eats Fan Page."
At the heart of evey complex problem lies a graceful solution involving explosives.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
tbox61
Member
Member


Joined: Aug 31, 2005
Posts: 76
Location: Great Bend, KS

PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 2:17 pm    Post subject: Re: .44 Magnum durability Reply with quote

Al,
Very interesting! Thanks for the tip! They have not been chamfered or polished, I will try that when I have time.

As far as the cylinder gap, what should it be? I assume you can get a feeler gauge at Midway USA?
Tim

_________________
There are 2 theories to arguing with a woman...neither works.
Will Rogers
Back to top
View user's profile
roklok
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 11, 2005
Posts: 608
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska

PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 4:21 pm    Post subject: Re: .44 Magnum durability Reply with quote

Thanks for all your input. I'll send the Bisley back to Ruger,I really like this revolver and am not ready to give up on it. I prefer the grip frame to the more traditional single action frames. I have been tempted by the new Bisley vaquero .44 with a 4 5/8 barrel as a carry gun while hunting. Maybe I'll have to pick one up as a spare.
Back to top
View user's profile
Al_Sohlstrom
Member
Member


Joined: Aug 30, 2005
Posts: 75

PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 4:30 pm    Post subject: Re: .44 Magnum durability Reply with quote

Hi

Mine's coming form Sears, for $6, and I'm hoping it'll work. For a bit more, I can get one with offset-tip blades, for valve tappets. At $6 to $8, I can experiment a little.

Brownells has one as well, but it's $24 for Standard and $58 for Metric.

As for the correct gap: I have no idea!

YET!!

I'm finding out stuff at a tremendous rate (one of the benefits of not having to leave my bedroom. Lol - not HAVING to - yeah - that sounds NICE! Not BEING ABLE TO, more like!!), and my brand new Taurus Model 608 looks like it was rode hard and put up wet! I'm in the process of finding out how to tune a revolver, even as we speak!

[edit] Hey! Cool!! A quick Internet Ferretting turns up some interesting information!

First: Smithed barrel/cylinder gap is somewhere between .002" and .007", tending to the lower numbers, but an article from Guns Magazine, where he did some actual experiementation, indicates that barrel/cylinder gap isn't much of a factor!

It's a good read, too.

He seems to think that the roughness/smoothness of the barrel is much more important.

A couple of gunsmithing sites aim at about .002" and .003" though. My feeling, given the above, "gap don't matter," sentiment, is that may be TOO skinney, and may require more smoothing, flattening and truing of the cylinder face and the barrel.

It looks like manufacturer's gaps hang out at the .004" to .006"

I'm curious about my firearms. As soon as my feeler guage gets in, I'll post a follow-up!
[/edit]

_________________
"Al's Postings," from the, "Good Eats Fan Page."
At the heart of evey complex problem lies a graceful solution involving explosives.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
515034s10ring
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Sep 08, 2005
Posts: 1153
Location: Working my way back up and around

PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 7:49 pm    Post subject: Re: .44 Magnum durability Reply with quote

My take on this is either the S&W 29/629 and the Ruger SBH and not the SRH/RH models are not able to sustain heavy thumpin loads. While the Ruger SBH is stronger than the 29/629 i've noticed with 'attempting' to load 330gr hammerheads (years ago) in a SBH and it did not fit. I then contacted a local gunsmith and was told that while it can handle the heavy hitters, they cut the cylinder back a few thou. to make it so you can't make it digest the wrist twisters. But then the both of us figured, guys now started loading their 'lighter' bullets into +p ballistics and they don't know the limitations of the gun thinking it can take anything because it's a magnum.

Through a few tests that my friends and i have done, if you want a good custom 44 that you can feed anything, get a Gary Reeder and that will set ya. Wink However, if you want a factory gun that can be on a heavy diet, you are almost limited to DA because at the time the only revolver we didn't test was the Ruger Bisley, and just with my knowledge of that gun, i'd bet you wouldn't have a problem. Although, now for the DA revolvers, Dan Wesson, Ruger SRH and RH, and Taurus Raging Bull are the ONLY revolvers i know that can handle the punishing pressures that are being made.

And i will tell you the 500 S&W CAN hold it's own! I am not currently loading them, but my friend is loading some 700gr FWNGC with 30.4 H-110 and i'll be the first to admit.....It just doesn't burp, it ROARS!
Back to top
View user's profile
grimel
Member
Member


Joined: Jan 28, 2005
Posts: 160

PostPosted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 6:23 am    Post subject: Re: .44 Magnum durability Reply with quote

You do realize the only diff between the Bisley and regular SBH is the grip right? The Taurus won't hold up. The Dan Wesson I don't know about.

There is a reason the top 'smiths use the Ruger Super Black Hawks for their custom sledgehammers.

_________________
But.....ain't many troubles that a man caint fix
with seven hundred dollars and his thirty ought six.

Lindy Cooper Wisdom

Back to top
View user's profile
515034s10ring
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Sep 08, 2005
Posts: 1153
Location: Working my way back up and around

PostPosted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 8:39 am    Post subject: Re: .44 Magnum durability Reply with quote

The difference in grip frame is not what i was getting at.... some (production) Bisleys i have seen 'with' cylinders that were .0625 longer, although i don't know why, and most did come on hunter models.
Plus i forgot to add that 'factory' cylinders are not made to withstand pressures of heavy +P loads and under normal circumstances need to be reamed to shoot the 'hotter' loads to reduce pressures and prevent flame cutting.

And on the contrary, Taurus, which i DID have doubts, and i have posed a biased opinion toward all of their guns because of an early semi that i owned, but what i know now and talk about Tarus is absolute fact! I pumped Garrett 330gr hammerheads as well as some home rolled loads, and the Taurus RB 8" 44Mag shot them like nothing! This was a friends gun, and what i was told from him was "trust me... have or would i put your life in danger? Well, this gun won't eather" and rest assured, Taurus has come a VERY long way!

Dan Wesson revolver's are hard to come by now since the merger with CZ. Sad However, i have shot their 357 & 445 supermags, but as convention would have it, they were short lived.

The SBH is very well the chioce for top smiths, and i have even built one of my revolvers using a SBH....But, i don't know of many smiths that use anything else but the frame for custom work.
Back to top
View user's profile
roklok
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 11, 2005
Posts: 608
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska

PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 9:08 am    Post subject: Re: .44 Magnum durability Reply with quote

I went to Garrett's website and found it very enlightening,sure enough for the 330 gr hammerhead + P load the only recommended factory guns were Ruger Redhawk ,Super Redhawk, Dan Wesson and the Taurus raging bull. It said that the Freedom arms was strong enough but the cylinder wasnt long enough,and the load produced too much pressure for (and wouldnt fit anyway) S&W and Ruger Super Blackhawk. This was enough to convince me to go to the local gunshop and order a 5.5 inch Redhawk,it should handle anything it can be fed and if I ever need a "bear gun", loaded with hammerheads it should fill the bill. When it comes in I'll send the Bisley back to Ruger,while I dont plan on shooting it till its fixed its nice to have a .44 around.
Back to top
View user's profile
LittleMagnum
Member
Member


Joined: Jul 05, 2005
Posts: 105
Location: Vermont

PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 4:32 pm    Post subject: Re: .44 Magnum durability Reply with quote

Back in 1982 I picked up a New Ruger Redhawk 7 1/2 brl. This gun has seen 1000's of not so nice loads. Back when I didn't know better, I would Load 180gr HP up to the max, just under cases sticking. I liked how flat they shot, compared to 240gr. After 1500 round's of 180gr, I noticed the top strap was starting to get a gas burn cut line. Opp's...Stopped shooting those fast high pressure 180gr and haven't done anymore damage to the gun. I now shoot mostly, 240gr,270 and 300gr loads. .Redhawks are bullet proof, if you use common sense.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
GroovyJack
Member
Member


Joined: May 21, 2005
Posts: 621
Location: Bama

PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 6:39 pm    Post subject: Re: .44 Magnum durability Reply with quote

I have 2 SBH's , one bought new in 1979 , the other in 1982 ..
The older gun has over twenty thousand rounds documented thru it .. About five years ago contacted Ruger about a minor problem I was having .. They told me to send it to them and they would check it out .. When I got it back , I thought they had returned someone else's revolver ..
Not only did they fix the little problem , but got an inspection certificate from them , stating they had stripped it and replaced evrything that needed replacing .. And it was reblued .. The bill ?? Free , Nada , No charge ..
Jack

_________________
My Goal In Life Is To Be As Good Of A Person As My Dog Already Thinks I Am
Back to top
View user's profile
515034s10ring
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Sep 08, 2005
Posts: 1153
Location: Working my way back up and around

PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 9:09 am    Post subject: Re: .44 Magnum durability Reply with quote

LittleMagnum, if you still wanted to shoot the lighter rounds and are worried about the flame-cutting issue, have a 'knowledgeable' pistolsmith polish your forcing cone and ream the cylinder.
Or you could also have an action job done which includes: checking headspace, cylinder gap, timing, smoothing of internal parts, lighten trigger pull, and usually recut forcing cone. All this with an additional high polished forcing cone should cost no more than $150, or unless a problem arises and something has to be replaced.

Why i suggest this is because i as well expierenced flame-cutting with my RH, and yes it was from hot loads that turned my tank into a flamethrower. Cool
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Gun & Firearm Discussions
Page 1 of 3
All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by *Dizfunkshunal* :.