HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous


Membership:
Latest: RichardZ
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 1
Overall: 13126

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 348
BOT: 1
Total: 349
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Forums
02: Forums
03: Forums
04: Forums
05: Forums
06: Forums
07: Forums
08: Photo Albums
09: Forums
10: Forums
11: Forums
12: Forums
13: Your Account
14: Forums
15: Forums
16: Photo Albums
17: Your Account
18: Home
19: Forums
20: Home
21: Forums
22: Home
23: Forums
24: Forums
25: Forums
26: Home
27: Forums
28: Forums
29: Forums
30: Forums
31: Forums
32: Forums
33: Forums
34: Home
35: News
36: Home
37: Forums
38: Your Account
39: Home
40: Forums
41: Forums
42: Your Account
43: Forums
44: Your Account
45: Photo Albums
46: Your Account
47: Photo Albums
48: Photo Albums
49: Forums
50: Forums
51: Forums
52: Forums
53: Forums
54: Forums
55: Forums
56: Forums
57: Home
58: Forums
59: Forums
60: Your Account
61: Photo Albums
62: Forums
63: Your Account
64: Forums
65: Forums
66: Your Account
67: Forums
68: Forums
69: Forums
70: Photo Albums
71: Your Account
72: Forums
73: Forums
74: Forums
75: Home
76: Forums
77: Home
78: Home
79: Forums
80: Forums
81: Forums
82: Forums
83: Forums
84: Forums
85: Photo Albums
86: Forums
87: Your Account
88: Photo Albums
89: Your Account
90: Forums
91: Forums
92: Forums
93: Home
94: Forums
95: Forums
96: Forums
97: Forums
98: Forums
99: Forums
100: Forums
101: Forums
102: Your Account
103: Home
104: Forums
105: Forums
106: Home
107: Your Account
108: Your Account
109: Photo Albums
110: Photo Albums
111: Home
112: Home
113: Forums
114: Your Account
115: Forums
116: Forums
117: Forums
118: Forums
119: Home
120: Home
121: Forums
122: Forums
123: Forums
124: Forums
125: Forums
126: Forums
127: Forums
128: Photo Albums
129: Forums
130: Home
131: Forums
132: Forums
133: Home
134: Forums
135: Forums
136: Forums
137: Forums
138: Forums
139: Forums
140: Forums
141: Forums
142: Photo Albums
143: Forums
144: Forums
145: Photo Albums
146: Forums
147: Forums
148: Forums
149: Home
150: Home
151: Home
152: Forums
153: Forums
154: Forums
155: Your Account
156: Forums
157: Forums
158: Forums
159: Forums
160: Forums
161: Your Account
162: Your Account
163: Forums
164: Home
165: Forums
166: Forums
167: Forums
168: Forums
169: Forums
170: Your Account
171: Forums
172: Forums
173: Home
174: Forums
175: Forums
176: Forums
177: Photo Albums
178: Forums
179: Forums
180: Forums
181: Forums
182: Your Account
183: Forums
184: Forums
185: Your Account
186: Forums
187: Forums
188: Forums
189: Forums
190: Forums
191: Photo Albums
192: Forums
193: Forums
194: Forums
195: Forums
196: Forums
197: Forums
198: Forums
199: Forums
200: Forums
201: Your Account
202: Forums
203: Forums
204: Forums
205: Forums
206: Your Account
207: Forums
208: Photo Albums
209: Forums
210: Forums
211: Home
212: Forums
213: Forums
214: Forums
215: Home
216: Forums
217: Forums
218: Photo Albums
219: Forums
220: Photo Albums
221: Forums
222: Forums
223: Forums
224: Forums
225: Forums
226: Home
227: Forums
228: Photo Albums
229: Forums
230: Forums
231: Forums
232: Forums
233: Forums
234: Forums
235: Your Account
236: Home
237: Forums
238: Your Account
239: Your Account
240: Forums
241: Forums
242: Forums
243: Forums
244: Forums
245: Photo Albums
246: Forums
247: Forums
248: Home
249: Home
250: Forums
251: Forums
252: Forums
253: Your Account
254: Forums
255: Forums
256: Forums
257: Forums
258: Forums
259: Forums
260: Forums
261: Forums
262: Forums
263: Treasury
264: Forums
265: Forums
266: Your Account
267: Home
268: Photo Albums
269: Home
270: Your Account
271: Forums
272: Forums
273: Your Account
274: Home
275: Forums
276: Home
277: Your Account
278: Forums
279: Home
280: Forums
281: Your Account
282: Forums
283: Forums
284: Forums
285: Forums
286: Photo Albums
287: Photo Albums
288: Forums
289: Forums
290: Your Account
291: Forums
292: Photo Albums
293: Home
294: Photo Albums
295: Forums
296: Photo Albums
297: Forums
298: Forums
299: Home
300: Forums
301: Photo Albums
302: Forums
303: Forums
304: Forums
305: Photo Albums
306: Forums
307: Forums
308: Forums
309: Your Account
310: Forums
311: Photo Albums
312: Forums
313: Forums
314: Forums
315: Forums
316: Forums
317: Home
318: Your Account
319: Home
320: Forums
321: Forums
322: Photo Albums
323: Home
324: Photo Albums
325: Home
326: Forums
327: Your Account
328: Home
329: Forums
330: Your Account
331: Forums
332: Photo Albums
333: Photo Albums
334: Forums
335: Forums
336: Your Account
337: Forums
338: Your Account
339: Photo Albums
340: Forums
341: Forums
342: Forums
343: Forums
344: Your Account
345: Photo Albums
346: Forums
347: Forums
348: Forums
  BOT:
01: Photo Albums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 308
 Pictures: 2451
  · Views: 820723
  · Votes: 1316
  · Comments: 86
 

Reduced Rifle Loads
Discussion regarding the reloading of ammunition and tuning of loads for accuracy
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Reloading Ammunition

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
MacD
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Apr 08, 2011
Posts: 1052
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:20 am    Post subject: Reduced Rifle Loads Reply with quote

I thought this might be an interesting topic.

I see a number of reasons for using reduced loads in rifles.
1. Reduced powder use hence cost.
2. Lower recoil.
3. Less time waiting for barrels to cool.
4. Enabling the use of cast lead bullets
5. Longer brass life.

I have used reduced loads in. 223 and found these fun for those days that all you want to do is plink away a steel target. I have never got serious about it though until I watched the youtube videos that are linked below while searching for information on the 6.5x55.

The big problem is finding reliable load data for pistol speed powders in rifle calibers other than a few pf the popular ones such as the. 223 and. 308. So do any of the Nuts have some wisdom or experience they want to share on this topic?

www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKDUBUWvBfU
m.youtube.com/watch?v=I5RLP8He8ok

_________________
La a'Blair s'math n Cairdean
(Friends are good on the day of battle)
Back to top
View user's profile
gelandangan
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 07, 2006
Posts: 6396
Location: Sydney Australia

PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2014 2:15 pm    Post subject: Re: Reduced Rifle Loads Reply with quote

As a sub sonic shooter, I shoot a lot of reduced load.
I think you may want to add #6 on your list, often reduced load could improve accuracy.

For powder, the easy one would be trail boss, although a lot of people uses Unique.

_________________
A straight line is the shortest distance between two points.
A smile is the shortest distance between two people.

Do - Not try!


gelandangan.weebly.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
chambered221
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 17, 2007
Posts: 3455
Location: Lost for good !!!

PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2014 3:32 pm    Post subject: Re: Reduced Rifle Loads Reply with quote

Mac, I think it's a great idea !!!
It's a lot of the same reasoning I got my 221Fireball Very Happy

Guys I've known that have done it have refered to it as a hobby within a hobby.

_________________
Ask as many people needed, sooner or later your question will be answered the way you want it answered !!!

A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.
~George Washington
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
gelandangan
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 07, 2006
Posts: 6396
Location: Sydney Australia

PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2014 3:35 pm    Post subject: Re: Reduced Rifle Loads Reply with quote

Mac you may want to read this www.gmdr.com/lever/lowveldata.htm

_________________
A straight line is the shortest distance between two points.
A smile is the shortest distance between two people.

Do - Not try!


gelandangan.weebly.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
MacD
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Apr 08, 2011
Posts: 1052
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2014 5:00 pm    Post subject: Re: Reduced Rifle Loads Reply with quote

Thanks Gelandagan. Going to open a beer and study some of those tables.

_________________
La a'Blair s'math n Cairdean
(Friends are good on the day of battle)
Back to top
View user's profile
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 8314
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2014 6:48 pm    Post subject: Re: Reduced Rifle Loads Reply with quote

I work up a lot of reduced loads. I can't always get to the 500 yard range plus without dedicated load development, its hard to hit a water jug at that distance for terminal performance testing. So I use reduced loads from 25 to 250 yards to replicate longer range impacts. I have found a that:
- Trailboss won't win any awards for consistent velocity so don't expect it to shoot accurately. Its hard to get velocities up to 2000 fps. I was stuffing as much into the case as I could including stopping every 5 to 10 grains to compress what was in the case (.243, .277, .300 WM) and its always shot fine.
- most bullets designed for high-speed rifles do not expand well below 2000 fps.
- you may need to use shorter bullets to compensate for loss of stability due to the lower launch velocity.

I just started using H4895 for reduced loads. Any of Hodgdon's published loads for H4895 can be safely reduced to 60% of max.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Gil Martin
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jan 28, 2005
Posts: 1837
Location: Schnecksville, PA

PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2014 6:57 pm    Post subject: Re: Reduced Rifle Loads Reply with quote

I have been loading cast bullets in centerfire rifles for decades using Unique powder. Reduced loads are useful for training new shooters and woods loafing while looking for small critters.

There are warnings regarding the use of certain powders being dangerous in reduced loads. I have had good results using IMR4895 in my rifles.

Good topic. All the best...
Gil

_________________
Gil
Back to top
View user's profile
Elvis
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: 9239
Location: south island New Zealand

PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2014 7:01 pm    Post subject: Re: Reduced Rifle Loads Reply with quote

I load 7.62x39mm sub loads with trail boss. not looking to win any trophies for accuracy,minute of rabbit at 25yrds is any Gods amount enough for this Kiwi. main use I see for them is finisher rounds that dont cause big boom or wreck more meat than needed. and possums ,hares ,bunnies and cats while out after deer etc without disturbing area, through a suppressor they are just a phiiitttt, as quiet if not more so than subsonic .22 through moderator.
oh yeah other HUGE reason/advantage is for recoil shy person or one who has developed a flinch...they get you back shooting and used to big rifle again,when a normal load put in you have been "reprogrammed" by the gentle loads.

_________________
You shot it You pluck it !
Them who eats the most duck eats the most feathers!
Back to top
View user's profile
MacD
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Apr 08, 2011
Posts: 1052
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Wed Dec 24, 2014 12:25 am    Post subject: Re: Reduced Rifle Loads Reply with quote

I should have mentioned that I use Clays with a load right from the Hodgdon reloading guide. The load is for 55 grain jacketed but it works fine for tumble lubed cast around the same weight. It isn't a great accuracy load but it knocks over the spinners just fine. The cast bullets do no damage to the steel as they hit not much harder than 40 grain lr bullets. I must see if I can improve the accuracy as soon as a good weather day and my free time coincide.

_________________
La a'Blair s'math n Cairdean
(Friends are good on the day of battle)
Back to top
View user's profile
Aloysius
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Nov 03, 2009
Posts: 2437
Location: B., Belgium

PostPosted: Wed Dec 24, 2014 2:42 am    Post subject: Re: Reduced Rifle Loads Reply with quote

Mac, visit www.hn-sport.de/en/pro...ading.html and see what they give for loaddata for their copperplated bullets. I normally use Vitha's N110 powder. Now here's the trick: don't do loaddevelloppement, use the data they give and only change COAL to get the best results.
I tried to get the same results with other powder, but that's not easy at all. In my opinion: start with N110 and afterwards try to improve these results.

Using lead bullets makes me chose between 2 kinds of powder: a very fast burning powder or a powder used for magnumloads in a .357 or .44 RM. I can never predict which approach will be the best without testing.
Back to top
View user's profile
Grumulkin
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Apr 16, 2007
Posts: 365
Location: Central Ohio

PostPosted: Wed Dec 24, 2014 6:07 am    Post subject: Re: Reduced Rifle Loads Reply with quote

MacD wrote:
I thought this might be an interesting topic.

I see a number of reasons for using reduced loads in rifles.
1. Reduced powder use hence cost.
2. Lower recoil.
3. Less time waiting for barrels to cool.
4. Enabling the use of cast lead bullets
5. Longer brass life.

I have used reduced loads in. 223 and found these fun for those days that all you want to do is plink away a steel target. I have never got serious about it though until I watched the youtube videos that are linked below while searching for information on the 6.5x55.

The big problem is finding reliable load data for pistol speed powders in rifle calibers other than a few pf the popular ones such as the. 223 and. 308. So do any of the Nuts have some wisdom or experience they want to share on this topic?

www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKDUBUWvBfU
m.youtube.com/watch?v=I5RLP8He8ok

I think the reasons you mention are ones often discussed but mostly bad:

1. The difference between a full power and a reduced load is usually just a few grains of powder. You're not going to save that much.

2. Lower recoil is the reason most people use reduced loads. Pretty silly I think. They go out and buy some fire spitting weapon and the first question is how they can reduce the load. Kind of like buying a Corvette and then installing a governor to limit speed to 35 miles per hour.

3. Maybe your shooting is different than mine. The only time my barrels get hot would be shooting a CMP match. Other than that, they never get so hot I need to let them cool.

4. Rather than calling cast bullet loads reduced loads, I would prefer to call them optimal loads and I fully endorse that concept. It's called loading appropriately for the bullet you're using.

5. I suppose with the price of brass, longer life would be advantageous but it's never stopped me from trying to get the most out of what I'm shooting.

If you want to load something with pistol powder, try contacting Seafire, the Dark Lord of Blue Dot Loads, at 24hourcampfire.com.

Subsonic loads have also been mentioned. I wouldn't call them reduced loads but optimal loads. You're unlikely to get optimal accuracy with a light bullet and a reduced load. You'll probably go with a heavy bullet (like a 220 grainer in a 300 Blackout) over a small load (say 10.5 grains of 1680); it's a load that optimally fits the purpose and not a light load.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Suzanne
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jun 27, 2009
Posts: 3323
Location: Eugene, Oregon

PostPosted: Wed Dec 24, 2014 7:35 am    Post subject: Re: Reduced Rifle Loads Reply with quote

What would you call it if you have an antique that you want to be careful of and still shoot but with less than full power? (Just curious about the semantics, don't want to offend anyone)


Suz

_________________
May the moon keep you centered,
May the sun keep you dancing,
And the stars shed light on your dreams.
Back to top
View user's profile
Vince
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: May 25, 2005
Posts: 15701
Location: Brisbane AUSTRALIA

PostPosted: Wed Dec 24, 2014 8:55 am    Post subject: Re: Reduced Rifle Loads Reply with quote

Only one answer for that question Suz...common sense. It's sensible to go easy on an old war horse 'cause they just aren't as strong as they used to be mate.

For all you Trail Boss users...give some thought to trying Alliant PROMO. I use it for my Clay Target loads in my 12g and also in my reduced power loads in my 30.30 because its more accurate by a long shot than TB.

_________________
Cheers, Vince Cheers

Illegitimi non carborundum
(Never let the bastards grind you down)

Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God.

"Nulla Si Fa Senza Volonta."
(Without Commitment, Nothing Gets Done)
Back to top
View user's profile AIM Address MSN Messenger Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
MacD
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Apr 08, 2011
Posts: 1052
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Wed Dec 24, 2014 9:59 am    Post subject: Re: Reduced Rifle Loads Reply with quote

Thanks for your comments Grum. I should have given a more complete reasoning for my list so here goes.
1. Powder Savings
My goto powder for the. 223 is either CFE223 or IMR8208 if I can get it. Both cost about $45 locally. I get about between 250 and 300 loads respectively out of a 1# can. I use Clays for my plinking load which I can buy for $35 a pound and get over 2300 loads.
2. Lower Recoil
Not a biggy for me although it makes rapid snap firing with a bolt gun faster as retaining your aiming point is easier. I took my neighbour and his 14 YO out for his and her very first shooting experience and the mild recoil and report made it a good introduction to shooting for them both.
3.Less Time Waiting for Barrel to Cool
I perhaps should have worded this one better. On a warm summer day, even with my medium profile barrel, continuous shooting will eventually cause enough barrel heating to result in vertical creep in POI. Ever do transits? That is an exercise where you move through several types of targets and stances including spinners, shotgun clays hanging from a bar and sitting on the berm face and several other targets at varying ranges and elevations and then finish with 10 aimed shots at a 50 meter target. Usually 90 rapid fired rounds with your partner stuffing mags furiously and then one miniute for those last ten shots. Cool barrels lead to "kool" results.
4. Enables Shooting of Cast Lead Bullets
My Clays load gives me around 1000 FPS which is slow enough for even non-checked lead bullets. My regular loads for an equivalent jacketed bullet are all over 3000 FPS. As a bonus shooting lead costs me pretty well nothing for bullets. Using even bulk Hornady SP's at $18 per hundred puts me back $414 if I shot 2300 of them.
5. Longer Brass Life
Not so far an issue for my. 223 but my 35 Remington eats brass after only a few firings. I have had the rifle checked and only neck size the cases but the case design seems to limit brass life. These are also Remington cases which may be a factor. A reduced load would help me get more loads from each case and more range time with this rifle, a pump action. It took me several months and numerous emails and phone calls to find cases so I am a bit worried about using them up shooting paper and gongs. This is why Glenandagan's post got me all excited as it had load information for pistol speed powders in this calibre.
6. Optimum Loads
Not my reason but a good one that you also seem to see as a benefit. Haven't gone there yet but plan on it soon as my aimed shots at the end of a transit are not a pretty sight.

_________________
La a'Blair s'math n Cairdean
(Friends are good on the day of battle)
Back to top
View user's profile
Elvis
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: 9239
Location: south island New Zealand

PostPosted: Wed Dec 24, 2014 12:26 pm    Post subject: Re: Reduced Rifle Loads Reply with quote

trail boss I can get in a 434grain container for $15
versus a 1/2lb for much more initial outlay and would last forever at 6grains a load.
if I can get a sample of that powder I may give it a whirl Vince.

_________________
You shot it You pluck it !
Them who eats the most duck eats the most feathers!
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Reloading Ammunition
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by *Dizfunkshunal* :.