HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous


Membership:
Latest: CapJones
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 12468

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 365
BOT: 3
Total: 368
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Forums
02: Forums
03: Photo Albums
04: Forums
05: Forums
06: Home
07: Photo Albums
08: Forums
09: Forums
10: Forums
11: Forums
12: Forums
13: Forums
14: Forums
15: Forums
16: Forums
17: Forums
18: Forums
19: Photo Albums
20: Photo Albums
21: Photo Albums
22: Forums
23: Forums
24: Your Account
25: Photo Albums
26: Photo Albums
27: Forums
28: Forums
29: Forums
30: Forums
31: Photo Albums
32: Photo Albums
33: Forums
34: Forums
35: Home
36: Forums
37: Forums
38: Forums
39: Forums
40: Forums
41: Forums
42: Forums
43: Home
44: Forums
45: Forums
46: Photo Albums
47: Your Account
48: Forums
49: Forums
50: Forums
51: Forums
52: Forums
53: Forums
54: Forums
55: Forums
56: Forums
57: Forums
58: Forums
59: Forums
60: Forums
61: Forums
62: Forums
63: Forums
64: Forums
65: Forums
66: Forums
67: Forums
68: Forums
69: Forums
70: Forums
71: Forums
72: Forums
73: Forums
74: Forums
75: Photo Albums
76: Photo Albums
77: Photo Albums
78: Photo Albums
79: Forums
80: Photo Albums
81: Photo Albums
82: Forums
83: Photo Albums
84: Photo Albums
85: Forums
86: Forums
87: Forums
88: Forums
89: Forums
90: Forums
91: Forums
92: Photo Albums
93: Home
94: Your Account
95: Photo Albums
96: Photo Albums
97: Photo Albums
98: Forums
99: Photo Albums
100: Forums
101: Photo Albums
102: Photo Albums
103: Photo Albums
104: Photo Albums
105: Photo Albums
106: Forums
107: Forums
108: Forums
109: Forums
110: Forums
111: Forums
112: Forums
113: Forums
114: Forums
115: Forums
116: Forums
117: Forums
118: Forums
119: Forums
120: Forums
121: Photo Albums
122: Photo Albums
123: Photo Albums
124: Photo Albums
125: Photo Albums
126: Photo Albums
127: Photo Albums
128: Photo Albums
129: Photo Albums
130: Photo Albums
131: Photo Albums
132: Photo Albums
133: Photo Albums
134: Photo Albums
135: Forums
136: Photo Albums
137: Forums
138: Your Account
139: Forums
140: Photo Albums
141: Forums
142: Forums
143: Statistics
144: Forums
145: Photo Albums
146: Photo Albums
147: Photo Albums
148: Photo Albums
149: Photo Albums
150: Photo Albums
151: Forums
152: Forums
153: Forums
154: Forums
155: Photo Albums
156: Photo Albums
157: Photo Albums
158: Photo Albums
159: Forums
160: Forums
161: Forums
162: Forums
163: Photo Albums
164: Photo Albums
165: Forums
166: Photo Albums
167: Photo Albums
168: Forums
169: Forums
170: Forums
171: Photo Albums
172: Photo Albums
173: Photo Albums
174: Home
175: Forums
176: Forums
177: Forums
178: Photo Albums
179: Photo Albums
180: Forums
181: Photo Albums
182: Photo Albums
183: Your Account
184: Forums
185: Forums
186: Forums
187: Forums
188: Forums
189: Photo Albums
190: Forums
191: Forums
192: Forums
193: Forums
194: Forums
195: Home
196: Forums
197: Your Account
198: Forums
199: Forums
200: Forums
201: Forums
202: Forums
203: Photo Albums
204: Photo Albums
205: Forums
206: Forums
207: Forums
208: Forums
209: Forums
210: Forums
211: Forums
212: Home
213: Forums
214: Photo Albums
215: Forums
216: Forums
217: Forums
218: Forums
219: Forums
220: Photo Albums
221: Your Account
222: Forums
223: Forums
224: Forums
225: Forums
226: Forums
227: Forums
228: Forums
229: Forums
230: Forums
231: Forums
232: Forums
233: Forums
234: Forums
235: Forums
236: Forums
237: Forums
238: Forums
239: Forums
240: Photo Albums
241: Photo Albums
242: Photo Albums
243: Photo Albums
244: Forums
245: Forums
246: Photo Albums
247: Forums
248: Photo Albums
249: Forums
250: Forums
251: Forums
252: Photo Albums
253: Photo Albums
254: Forums
255: Forums
256: Photo Albums
257: Forums
258: Forums
259: Forums
260: Forums
261: Forums
262: Forums
263: Forums
264: Forums
265: Forums
266: Forums
267: Forums
268: Forums
269: Forums
270: Forums
271: Forums
272: Forums
273: Photo Albums
274: Photo Albums
275: Forums
276: Home
277: Photo Albums
278: Forums
279: Forums
280: Forums
281: Forums
282: Forums
283: Forums
284: Forums
285: Forums
286: Your Account
287: Your Account
288: Forums
289: Your Account
290: Photo Albums
291: Photo Albums
292: Forums
293: Photo Albums
294: Forums
295: Photo Albums
296: Forums
297: Forums
298: Forums
299: Your Account
300: Forums
301: Forums
302: Forums
303: Forums
304: Forums
305: Forums
306: Forums
307: Forums
308: Forums
309: Forums
310: Forums
311: Forums
312: Forums
313: Forums
314: Photo Albums
315: Photo Albums
316: Forums
317: Photo Albums
318: Photo Albums
319: Photo Albums
320: Forums
321: Forums
322: Forums
323: Photo Albums
324: Forums
325: Forums
326: Forums
327: Forums
328: Forums
329: Forums
330: Forums
331: Forums
332: Forums
333: Forums
334: Photo Albums
335: Photo Albums
336: Photo Albums
337: Photo Albums
338: Photo Albums
339: Photo Albums
340: Photo Albums
341: Forums
342: Forums
343: Forums
344: Forums
345: Forums
346: Forums
347: Forums
348: Forums
349: Forums
350: Forums
351: Forums
352: Forums
353: Your Account
354: Your Account
355: Your Account
356: Forums
357: Forums
358: Photo Albums
359: Photo Albums
360: Photo Albums
361: Photo Albums
362: Photo Albums
363: Photo Albums
364: Photo Albums
365: Photo Albums
  BOT:
01: Forums
02: Forums
03: Photo Albums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 304
 Pictures: 2340
  · Views: 295993
  · Votes: 1302
  · Comments: 85
 

Support our Advertisers

muzzleloader loading
Hunting and discussion with Muzzle Loaders, Archery and other Primitive weapons
Go to page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
stevebanbury
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Feb 05, 2007
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 12:20 pm    Post subject: muzzleloader loading Reply with quote

I'm a new muzzleloader and I'm having problems loading my 50 cal. rifle. I'm using 45cal. bullets in 50 cal. sabots and with the bullet seated in the sabot it absolutely won't go into the barrel. Do I need to use some kind of lubricant or am I supposed to be putting in the sabot first and then the bullet (tried this and the bullet usually didn't seat into the sabot). HELP!
Back to top
View user's profile
DallanC
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: Jan 18, 2005
Posts: 3151
Location: Utah

PostPosted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 1:08 pm    Post subject: Re: muzzleloader loading Reply with quote

stevebanbury wrote:
I'm a new muzzleloader and I'm having problems loading my 50 cal. rifle. I'm using 45cal. bullets in 50 cal. sabots and with the bullet seated in the sabot it absolutely won't go into the barrel. Do I need to use some kind of lubricant or am I supposed to be putting in the sabot first and then the bullet (tried this and the bullet usually didn't seat into the sabot). HELP!

Hello!

Welcome to the fine and fun sport of muzzleloading. Its a blast litterally and figuratively. Ok let me try and give you some tips and overview of what might possibly be your problem.

To use sabots, you insert the bullet into the sabot, then you insert the combination into your barrel. Lubricant isnt needed.

There are two types of sabots for .50 caliber rifles. Ones that use a .44 cal bullet and one for a .45 caliber bullet. 44Caliber is actually .429" in diameter, .45 caliber is .451" in diameter. 44Cal sabots have thicker "ribs" to cover the space between the riflings and the bullet's jacket. .45 caliber sabots have thinner ribs due to the wider diameter of the .45 cal bullets.

So, off the top of my head, I think you have .44 caliber sabots and are using them with .45 caliber bullets. This would result in a near impossible to load combination.

Sabots for use with .44 caliber bullets are generally green, sabots for use with .45 caliber bullets are generally black, but this isnt always the case. What color and brand are your sabots? Does it say anywhere on the package what bullet to use with them? What about your bullets, are they .44 or .45 caliber?

I understand how this can be confusing to a new frontstuffer shooter so dont get frustrated yet! It should be easy to help solve your problems and give accuracy tips once you get it all worked out.


-DallanC
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
stevebanbury
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Feb 05, 2007
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 1:15 pm    Post subject: Re: muzzleloader loading Reply with quote

Thanks so much for the quick and informative reply. I'm at the office now so I can't check sabot colors but I purchase saboted bullets from Hornady and Barnes and neither work. The Hornadys are .45 cal. 240 gr. bullets in 50 cal. sabots which I think are black.
Back to top
View user's profile
glockman55
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Dec 12, 2005
Posts: 831
Location: Michigan

PostPosted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 2:47 pm    Post subject: Re: muzzleloader loading Reply with quote

What type of ML are you using? My old 54 cal. Haw ken would not allow me to load with a sabot. Like what was stated, there are different sizes and thicknesses of sabots. I now shoot an T.C. Encore in line 50 cal. and I use T/C Shock wave super glide sabots with a 300 gr. spire point. these sabots are yellow in color and load real easy. I used to use the regular Shock wave sabots which were black and loaded hard. I'm sure they make a Sabot that will work in your gun.

_________________
Are you boys gonna pull them pistols or whistle dixie?
Back to top
View user's profile Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Gigmaster
Member
Member


Joined: Dec 24, 2007
Posts: 64
Location: Chatsworth, Ga.

PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 3:42 am    Post subject: Re: muzzleloader loading Reply with quote

Do yourself a favor. Give the sabots away, and shoot patched roundballs, or minie-balls. You'll be way happier.

My personal favorite is Buffalo Ball-ets. They have the best of both worlds, and hit like a ton of bricks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
parkerbill
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Mar 18, 2008
Posts: 19
Location: Palm Coast, FL (formerly Parker, CO)

PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 3:49 pm    Post subject: Re: muzzleloader loading Reply with quote

One of the problems we have is the lack of standards in muzzleloader rifle making such as exist with centerfires. Bore sizes for .50 cal can run anywhere from .495 to .506 or more I'm told. This creates a real problem for bullet and sabot makers; and us.

My T/C Triumph is extremely hard to load, even with T/C Shockwaves in the EZ-Glide sabots. I have read that T/C bores are some of the tightest in the industry. I am still experimenting with different bullet and sabot combinations. You might want to check out MMP. They even ship free! For .50 cal using .451 bullets they make more than one size of sabot. They have a "standard" one, then in the HPH series they have the HPH-12, the HPH-24 which is thinner and the 3-Petal EZ.

I've found the 3-Petal EZ has been the easiest to load with 250 gr Shockwaves and 250 grain Barnes MZ Expanders. I've also read the Barnes 245 grain Spit-Fire tends to be easier to load and I have them on order now to try.

A few days ago I had an email discussion with Dave at Barnes and he also shoots a T/C, but an Omega. He was very helpful and said that while sabots need to fit tight in the barrel for best consistent accuracy, the max pressure that should be required to load a sabot down the barrel is around 30 lbs. He also suggested licking the sabot or using a very light coating of bore butter on the sabot, but I haven't had a chance to try either of those methods yet.

With the 250 grain Shockwave and Easy-Glide sabots I have to use a short starter to get them started and practically have to stand on the thing with my 215 lbs to start the sabot down the barrel, then use both hands and really apply the weight to get them down the barrel, then use the ball starter on top of the ramrod to seat them. Wayyyyyyy toooooo difficult!!!

The same bullet in the HPH-24 sabot from MMP was just a bit easier and with the 3-Petal EZ it was much easier. Accuracy? With 2 Triple-7 Magnum pellets and the Triple-7 209 primers, I was shooting MOA groups (some better, some worse) at 100 yards last Saturday.

Randy Wakeman's Article on Hard Sabot Loading. Lots of other good stuff there, too.

As for patched round balls (and not to start a flame war), well, they're fun to shoot in my Hawken, but I would not really consider hunting with them unless I want to limit my shots to very close range. Round balls have such a terrible ballistic coefficients they rapidly shed velocity and energy. Yes, I know and I agree, tons of game has been shot with them for the past few hundred years, but I'll betcha if those old-timers could have used better bullets they would have, don't you think?

I've had pretty good luck with the Hornady Great Plains 385 grain conicals in my .50 Hawken and I have read good things about Buffalo Bullets Ball-ets, although I haven't tried them.

To me it's all about putting the animal down as cleanly and humanely as possible and I feel that sabots and/or good conicals are way better at that than round balls. Hey, if you patched round balls for hunting, great!! I'm not trying to convince anyone one way or the other; just trying to assist the author of this thread.

Hope this helps. Shoot and hunt safe!
Back to top
View user's profile
Gigmaster
Member
Member


Joined: Dec 24, 2007
Posts: 64
Location: Chatsworth, Ga.

PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 4:22 pm    Post subject: Re: muzzleloader loading Reply with quote

Here is the rule, basically:

A rifle with a 1 in 60" twist riflling is made to shoot patched round balls.
A rifle with a 1 in 48" is a good 'all-'arounder' that will shoot balls, and bullets well.
A rifle with a 1 in 32" twist is made for sabots.

Anything less than a 1 in 32" twist will cause a sabot to 'tumble'.

From all reports I've read, sabots do not penetrate well, especially on shoulder shots. Sabots also are notorious for not expanding properly.

I kill deer on a regular basis with both primitve bows, and compounds, so a freight train bullet that shoots into the next county is not a requirement. At least in the SE, most of your shots will be 100 yards or less, well within patched round ball range.

Bottom line is that you need to use the round your rifle was designed to shoot, within its limits.

Semper Fi!
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
parkerbill
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Mar 18, 2008
Posts: 19
Location: Palm Coast, FL (formerly Parker, CO)

PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:44 pm    Post subject: Re: muzzleloader loading Reply with quote

Gigmaster wrote:
Here is the rule, basically:

A rifle with a 1 in 60" twist riflling is made to shoot patched round balls.
A rifle with a 1 in 48" is a good 'all-'arounder' that will shoot balls, and bullets well.
A rifle with a 1 in 32" twist is made for sabots.

Anything less than a 1 in 32" twist will cause a sabot to 'tumble'.

From all reports I've read, sabots do not penetrate well, especially on shoulder shots. Sabots also are notorious for not expanding properly.

I kill deer on a regular basis with both primitve bows, and compounds, so a freight train bullet that shoots into the next county is not a requirement. At least in the SE, most of your shots will be 100 yards or less, well within patched round ball range.

Bottom line is that you need to use the round your rifle was designed to shoot, within its limits.

Semper Fi!

I agree and disagree with what you are saying. Very Happy I do agree that you have to shoot the round your gun was designed for, but only if you take the time and shots to make sure the round you shoot works in your gun. I also agree that in the SE most shots at deer are normally pretty close, at least they were in Georgia where I lived and hunted for 20 years some years ago and it sure looks that way here in FL, too.

Out west is a very different story. Ranges can be much greater and in very open country for both whitetail and mule deer.

To be honest I'm not really sure one can compare bullets and arrows. Yes, they both have to penetrate, but don't they sort of do it in different ways?

If you are correct about twist rates for sabots having to be 1 in 32, then you'd better be telling all the gun makers, because most of the in-lines I've seen have 1 in 28 or even faster for heavier saboted bullets. My T/C Triumph is 1 in 28 and I'm shooting MOA or better groups with it, with the right bullet/sabot combinations. I do agree with your other twist rates, though. I know my Hawken is 1 in 48 and it seems to shoot both patched balls and conicals pretty well. I've never tried sabots in it and probably never will--kind of flies in the spirit of the Hawken-style. Very Happy

While earlier saboted bullets had some problems with penetration, etc., from everything I've heard or read, that is not the case today if you use the right bullets. Most of them, especially the Barnes muzzleloader bullets open up greatly down to around 1100 fps or so and blow right on through. I have to say though, that at this point I have not shot any game with them, although I will be wild boar hunting in a couple of weeks, so perhaps I'll have something more to report then.

Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against conicals or round balls either, if you like them for hunting.
Back to top
View user's profile
derwood
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Mar 10, 2008
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:09 pm    Post subject: Re: muzzleloader loading Reply with quote

hey just wanted to ad that everybody is right, rate of twist,sabot size. all of that is important but nobody said anything about seasoning the barrel, is it a new gun? if it is a good seasoning will help in loading as well as cleaning powder fouling.....
Back to top
View user's profile
Gigmaster
Member
Member


Joined: Dec 24, 2007
Posts: 64
Location: Chatsworth, Ga.

PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 9:31 pm    Post subject: Re: muzzleloader loading Reply with quote

A 1 in 28" twist is MORE than a 1 in 32" I said anything LESS than 1 in 32" will cause a sabot to tumble.

And , I did forget about seasoning the barrel. This is very important.

parkerbill wrote:
Gigmaster wrote:
Here is the rule, basically:

A rifle with a 1 in 60" twist riflling is made to shoot patched round balls.
A rifle with a 1 in 48" is a good 'all-'arounder' that will shoot balls, and bullets well.
A rifle with a 1 in 32" twist is made for sabots.

Anything less than a 1 in 32" twist will cause a sabot to 'tumble'.

From all reports I've read, sabots do not penetrate well, especially on shoulder shots. Sabots also are notorious for not expanding properly.

I kill deer on a regular basis with both primitve bows, and compounds, so a freight train bullet that shoots into the next county is not a requirement. At least in the SE, most of your shots will be 100 yards or less, well within patched round ball range.

Bottom line is that you need to use the round your rifle was designed to shoot, within its limits.

Semper Fi!

I agree and disagree with what you are saying. Very Happy I do agree that you have to shoot the round your gun was designed for, but only if you take the time and shots to make sure the round you shoot works in your gun. I also agree that in the SE most shots at deer are normally pretty close, at least they were in Georgia where I lived and hunted for 20 years some years ago and it sure looks that way here in FL, too.

Out west is a very different story. Ranges can be much greater and in very open country for both whitetail and mule deer.

To be honest I'm not really sure one can compare bullets and arrows. Yes, they both have to penetrate, but don't they sort of do it in different ways?

If you are correct about twist rates for sabots having to be 1 in 32, then you'd better be telling all the gun makers, because most of the in-lines I've seen have 1 in 28 or even faster for heavier saboted bullets. My T/C Triumph is 1 in 28 and I'm shooting MOA or better groups with it, with the right bullet/sabot combinations. I do agree with your other twist rates, though. I know my Hawken is 1 in 48 and it seems to shoot both patched balls and conicals pretty well. I've never tried sabots in it and probably never will--kind of flies in the spirit of the Hawken-style. Very Happy

While earlier saboted bullets had some problems with penetration, etc., from everything I've heard or read, that is not the case today if you use the right bullets. Most of them, especially the Barnes muzzleloader bullets open up greatly down to around 1100 fps or so and blow right on through. I have to say though, that at this point I have not shot any game with them, although I will be wild boar hunting in a couple of weeks, so perhaps I'll have something more to report then.

Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against conicals or round balls either, if you like them for hunting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
glockman55
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Dec 12, 2005
Posts: 831
Location: Michigan

PostPosted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 5:27 am    Post subject: Re: muzzleloader loading Reply with quote

Gigmaster: A 1 in 28" twist is MORE than a 1 in 32" I said anything LESS than 1 in 32" will cause a sabot to tumble.

We used to use sabot in our 1 in 48" hawkins and never saw any evidence of tumble with this set up, clean holes in the paper out to 100 yds. I realize this twist was made to use patch & ball or maxi-ball type bullets, which shot very good as well. I'm not doubting you at all, just never heard of this before. I shoot an Encore now and use ShockWave super glide 300 gr. with 130 gr. pellets, a little over kill for White tails but I like the way they group.

_________________
Are you boys gonna pull them pistols or whistle dixie?
Back to top
View user's profile Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Pumpkinslinger
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Sep 22, 2007
Posts: 4401
Location: NC foothills

PostPosted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:14 am    Post subject: Re: muzzleloader loading Reply with quote

Steve, you still there? Wink What make rifle is it?

I'm shooting a .50 Encore. My somewhat limited experience shooting saboted bullets showed that they shot better with no lube in the bore, the plastic is slick enough. I prefer the full caliber PowerBelt bullets and have good results with them (1.5 to 2" groups at 100 yards over 100 grains of Hodgdon 777.) Plain lead bullets don't shoot worth a darn in the Encore, the twist is too fast for them, causing them to strip out of the rifling.

If your twist will allow, Hornady makes a pure lead "Great Plains" bullet that is a modern Minie' ball. Hornady also has a new muzzleloader bullet that is an improved Minie' type but I haven't seen any to try yet.

_________________
Mike

"I ain't no better than anyone else, and there ain't no one better than me!" Ma Kettle

Back to top
View user's profile AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
parkerbill
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Mar 18, 2008
Posts: 19
Location: Palm Coast, FL (formerly Parker, CO)

PostPosted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 10:23 am    Post subject: Re: muzzleloader loading Reply with quote

Regarding "barrel seasoning"-- I read recently that with the modern steel barrels now in use seasoning the barrel is most likely a non-issue. The article went on to say that barrel seasoning harkens back to when barrels were made out of iron or softer steel and that with today's modern steels, well, you cannot really season them.

Not being a metallurgist, I don't have a clue as to whether or not what I read and paraphrased above is true or not, but it does sort of make sense.
Back to top
View user's profile
Gigmaster
Member
Member


Joined: Dec 24, 2007
Posts: 64
Location: Chatsworth, Ga.

PostPosted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 4:11 pm    Post subject: Re: muzzleloader loading Reply with quote

I season my bores the Thompsons Bore-Buttter, and never have to clean between shots, even with my percussion revolvers. I always keep a flim of Bore-Butter in the barrel. I've shot all day at the range and didn't clean until I got them home, then just simple dishwashing liquid and hot water make them sparkle like new (I love 777 Powder).

I have only tried sabots one time. I hated them, and gave the rest away. I fired maybe 3 or 4 of them. I have no personal experience with tumble. That came off of several websites, forums, and comments from people at the gun range.

The closest thing I use to a 'specialty' bullet is the Whitworth bullets I shoot in my Parker-Hale/Gibbs Whitworth Rifle. They are designed to shoot tiny groups at 700+ yards. They work great! The Whitworth is a bit long and heavy for comfortable hunting here in the woodsy SE, but I would use it out west in a heartbeat.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
parkerbill
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Mar 18, 2008
Posts: 19
Location: Palm Coast, FL (formerly Parker, CO)

PostPosted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 5:35 pm    Post subject: Re: muzzleloader loading Reply with quote

Well, in spite of what I relayed above about barrel seasoning I do leave a film of T/C Bore Butter on my bores after cleaning, but I can't say I've had the same experience as you (gigmaster) with not having to clean between shots. When I'm at the range (with sabots and Triple-7) I generally run a licked patch up and down the barrel, followed by a dry patch, then load. It's almost unbelievable how dirty that licked patch is when it comes out!

Supposedly the new Blackhorn 209 black powder substitute coming out in April eliminates having to clean the gun as much, as well as giving a bit more velocity to equal volumes of Triple-7, Pyrodex, etc. Blackhorn 209 is supposed to be much cleaner. Personally, I can hardly wait to try it.

While we're at it, no, I really do not consider a scoped modern-day in-line shooting 250 grain sabots at 2,000+ fps a totally primitive weapon, but then I don't really consider a modern-day compound bow with fiber-optic sites, trigger release, peep site, etc., exactly in the same light as a long bow or recurve either. There are a couple of very common threads, though: 1) for the most part they are single shot and 2) they all have to be loaded from the muzzle. I suppose an "expert" shot might extend the range a bit with a scoped in-line, but then "experts" were making 200+ yard shots with muzzleloaders in the early 1800's and scopes were being used back in the 1840s or 1850s. It's all about fun, whichever you choose, and more importantly for those of us who hunt, it's all about putting the animal down as quickly and humanely as possible, right?
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Primitive Weapons Hunting
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Advertisements
 


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by Dizfunkshunal :.