Handloading without a gov. license

Bushmaster

Here's one for you oboma lovers...NOT

gunowners.org

whittling

Well ,I guess that they figure that they can't ban guns ,ammo's a good place to start .

Joe Boleo

An new ammo tax can be imposed by executive order. Take care...
Joe

TRBLSHTR

F-ing wonderful,just makes me proud to be an american.How did we ever allow such a bunch of A-holes to ever get into office? wtf

Bushmaster

By voting for the better candidates of lesser parties instead of plugging our collective noses and voting for McCain (the better of two evils)...

lesterg3

Bushy, you are just so wise.

wncchester · Member Joined: Apr 08, 2006 Posts: 160

"An new ammo tax can be imposed by executive order. Take care..."

Well, not according to the Constitution. But few in DC pay any attention to that tired old doculment, soo ... who knows if he could get away with it?

Actually, at least one Democrat WOULD object if BO tried that, Bobby Byrd! Not that he's opposed to more spending and higher taxes at all but he IS defensive of his Constitutional duties and authority.

ElyBoy

Stink'in liberals.

Every morning I wake to find that the bastard liberals have slammed my sorry Conservative ass into the ground one more time. Mad

Can't wait till 2010. Very Happy

And no more Ron Paul crap from you guys who lost the election for us this time. Mad

Eric

BigBlue

I've lived my whole life trying my best to stay on the legal side of the law. It's a shame that at this stage of life I'm going to be forced to become a criminal.
Don

TRBLSHTR

I'll second that Don! Mad

Pumpkinslinger

Concerning laws... Remember that at one time it was "legal" to own slaves. In the early 1940s it was "legal" to kill Jews in Germany. What I'm trying to say is that sometimes "legal" doesn't mean crap. Laws are written and overturned all the time.

Handloader

IMO nothing radical will occur during BO's first term. He will priortize his reelection above his personal drive for change and that means some common sense, politically. When he is reelected with little to loose politically, we may see some rather bizarre proposals.

At this point, I doubt anyone in Congress wants to alienate 66 million gun owners; they, too, want to be reelected in 2010 and 2012.

In the interim, it would be advantageous for the gun owners of this country to become assertive and less defensive. It isn't that we should want less intrustion, rather, we should seek to reverse many of the current gun restrictions imposed by Fed, State or city laws. On the offensive, I say.

harrys · Rookie Member Joined: Jan 19, 2009 Posts: 16

What amazes me most of all the people in the usa and tht's all we get to choose from no wonder we are self destructing.Someone up there needs to realize they need to get off there asses and do their job right. Seems all they know how to do is tax this and tax tht.Do their job n bring business here not discourage it with taxes . Got to the point where it's no longer tax but EXTORTION..

wiersy111

Our system has failed the public, we now let the clown with the most money and the loudest mouth rally the majority. The majority being uninformed about the candidates or the issues, they then decide the fate of a whole nation based upon thier lack of information. It is scarry to look at who is calling the shots.

whittling

The reason that they are going after ammo is because the constitution doesn't mention anything about ammo specifically and they don't want to look like they hate the constitution.