HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: Polehammer
New Today: 1
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 13180

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 33
Bots: 1
Staff: 0
Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 314
 Pictures: 2470
  · Views: 825615
  · Votes: 1316
  · Comments: 85
 

150gr vs. 165gr coreloks
Discussion regarding the reloading of ammunition and tuning of loads for accuracy
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Reloading Ammunition

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
huntingstoneboy
Member
Member


Joined: Mar 19, 2006
Posts: 32

PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:37 pm    Post subject: 150gr vs. 165gr coreloks Reply with quote

I have been shooting deer with 150gr corelok (factory) out of a Rem. 7400 280 for some time. I have had great results with no complaints. The other day I was at Gander Mountain and ran across 165gr corelok. Believing that one can never have too much ammo I bought two boxes. At the time I thought that the heavier bullets would have more "thump", now that I've given it a little more thought I am wondering if these are for larger game ie. moose, elk and may not expand proper on a northeastern whitetail. I guess my question is a remington corelok a corelok regardless of weight and will it expand the same? Should I have stuck with what was working? (shots are usually close between 50 and 150yrds). And just for the record I try to handload for all my guns but loading for the 7400 has been a pain in the ass so far. Any thoughts on the corelok bullet construction would be appreciated.
Thanks
Huntingstoneboy.
Back to top
View user's profile
FALPhil
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 18, 2007
Posts: 377
Location: Dixie

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 11:47 am    Post subject: Re: 150gr vs. 165gr coreloks Reply with quote

I think that they are great bullets. I hunt white tails and mulies with 165 gr bullets in 30-06. I don't know why a 165 would be much different in a 280 Rem.

_________________
The Wicked Witch of the West is alive and well and serving as the Speaker of the House.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe Boleo
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Dec 25, 2006
Posts: 427
Location: Pennsylvania

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 5:16 pm    Post subject: Re: 150gr vs. 165gr coreloks Reply with quote

The .280 is one of my favorite rounds and either bullet should work just fine. I reload for the .280 and have mostly used Hornady 139 or 154 grain bullets. Take care...
Joe
Back to top
View user's profile
huntingstoneboy
Member
Member


Joined: Mar 19, 2006
Posts: 32

PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 6:52 pm    Post subject: Re: 150gr vs. 165gr coreloks Reply with quote

Thanks guys, I'm going to give these 165's a try next fall.
Back to top
View user's profile
ElyBoy
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Apr 04, 2006
Posts: 1541
Location: Forest Lake Minnesota

PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 4:43 pm    Post subject: Re: 150gr vs. 165gr coreloks Reply with quote

I reload for all of my guns, except for my .348 Model 71 Winchester.
I have always used the 200gr Remington Core-Locts in this fine gun for deer. A .348 Core-Loct bullet is not offered for reloading, and I still have a couple of Remington factory box remaining.
So my experience go's back forty years with the Core-Loct.
I also reload 200gr Core-Locts for my Model 81 BLR.

Don't worry about anything for deer with these bullets.
As far as I am concerned, the Core-Loct is the finest bullet ever for shooting deer.

You are "dead on" using any weight of them.

Eric

_________________
NRA Certified Chief Range Safety Officer
NRA Certified Pistol Instructor
DNR Certified Firearms Safety Instructor
NRA Life Member
Back to top
View user's profile
Devon
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Dec 08, 2007
Posts: 12

PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:57 am    Post subject: Re: 150gr vs. 165gr coreloks Reply with quote

Hi huntingstoneboy

What you may find is that you will have to start again and work a load up.

When the heavier bullet enters the barrel with the same charge, the pressure behind it will go up. This doesn't always result in a higher velocity though as you also need to know the burn rate of the powder that you are using. Primer goes bang, powder ignites and a pressure curve starts. Pressure goes up whilst bullet is losing inertia - starting to move. When the bullet goes into the barrel it will start to stretch length ways (you can't compress it) because the barrel starts to constrict. There are stories of recovered bullets with lead missing out of the back but anyway. This is sort of important because the copper jacket gets stressed, the lead starts to move, the pressure goes up and you will probably get more recoil - not that you will notice it - and the bullet hasn't even left the barrel!

When it gets to the deer, you want a bullet that is where you want it to be and in good condition - still able to expand and do it's job.

I would say that if you are taking your deer with the 150 grain and it is reasonably accurate, I wouldn't change. You may get more energy at the point of the kill but there's no deader than dead!

Keep well

Devon
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Reloading Ammunition
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 7 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by *Dizfunkshunal* :.