HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: Holm
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 13219

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 144
Bots: 1
Staff: 0
Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 315
 Pictures: 2480
  · Views: 838475
  · Votes: 1316
  · Comments: 85
 

Rem. 722 question
Discussions related to Guns and Firearms

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bushman270
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Dec 08, 2009
Posts: 9
Location: Russian Mission, Alaska

PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 8:18 am    Post subject: Rem. 722 question Reply with quote

I have an old Remington 722, chambered in a .222 Rem. I bought it second hand, and I noticed that the rear portion of the receiver is not level with the front portion of the scope mounting screw holes. Is this the way they're built? Or is this paticular gun a defect?
Back to top
View user's profile
Donut Slayer
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jun 27, 2007
Posts: 594
Location: Pensacola, Florida

PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 10:42 am    Post subject: Re: Rem. 722 question Reply with quote

If I'm understanding you right, you are saying the rear base is thicker than the front to be level? That should be how its made.

_________________
Browning X-Bolt in 30'06. The work for a pet load starts again. Wink The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bushman270
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Dec 08, 2009
Posts: 9
Location: Russian Mission, Alaska

PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:26 am    Post subject: Re: Rem. 722 question Reply with quote

No the rear base is thinner.
Back to top
View user's profile
Donut Slayer
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jun 27, 2007
Posts: 594
Location: Pensacola, Florida

PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 12:53 pm    Post subject: Re: Rem. 722 question Reply with quote

Did you switch the front for the rear? Maybe they are on reversed? Its hard to visualize what is being typed, a pic would do wonders.

_________________
Browning X-Bolt in 30'06. The work for a pet load starts again. Wink The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
SingleShotLover
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Dec 26, 2007
Posts: 1006
Location: Illinois

PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 4:00 pm    Post subject: Re: Rem. 722 question Reply with quote

If I'm remembering correctly, one piece bases for the 722 actually came with a shim that was meant to fit between the receiver and the base to level the base. Otherwise, two-piece bases were taller for the rear than the front.

_________________
If you can't hit it with one, you probably can't with two either!

The biggest problem with a closed mind is that it never seems to come with a closed mouth.

SSL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
bushman270
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Dec 08, 2009
Posts: 9
Location: Russian Mission, Alaska

PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 4:07 pm    Post subject: Re: Rem. 722 question Reply with quote

Thanks for your help.
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Gun & Firearm Discussions
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 7 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by *Dizfunkshunal* :.