User Info
 Welcome Anonymous
Membership:
 Latest: Holm
 New Today: 0
 New Yesterday: 0
 Overall: 13219
People Online:
 Members: 0
 Visitors: 144
 Bots: 1
 Staff: 0
Staff Online:No staff members are online!
Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
• Albums: 315
• Pictures: 2480 · Views: 838475 · Votes: 1316
· Comments: 85
|
Rem. 722 questionDiscussions related to Guns and Firearms
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
bushman270 Rookie Member


Joined: Dec 08, 2009 Posts: 9 Location: Russian Mission, Alaska
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 8:18 am Post subject: Rem. 722 question |
|
I have an old Remington 722, chambered in a .222 Rem. I bought it second hand, and I noticed that the rear portion of the receiver is not level with the front portion of the scope mounting screw holes. Is this the way they're built? Or is this paticular gun a defect?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Donut Slayer Super Member


Joined: Jun 27, 2007 Posts: 594 Location: Pensacola, Florida
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bushman270 Rookie Member


Joined: Dec 08, 2009 Posts: 9 Location: Russian Mission, Alaska
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:26 am Post subject: Re: Rem. 722 question |
|
No the rear base is thinner.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Donut Slayer Super Member


Joined: Jun 27, 2007 Posts: 594 Location: Pensacola, Florida
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SingleShotLover Super Member


Joined: Dec 26, 2007 Posts: 1006 Location: Illinois
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 4:00 pm Post subject: Re: Rem. 722 question |
|
If I'm remembering correctly, one piece bases for the 722 actually came with a shim that was meant to fit between the receiver and the base to level the base. Otherwise, two-piece bases were taller for the rear than the front.
_________________ If you can't hit it with one, you probably can't with two either!
The biggest problem with a closed mind is that it never seems to come with a closed mouth.
SSL |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bushman270 Rookie Member


Joined: Dec 08, 2009 Posts: 9 Location: Russian Mission, Alaska
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 4:07 pm Post subject: Re: Rem. 722 question |
|
Thanks for your help.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
All times are GMT - 7 Hours
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|